Journal rdewald's Journal: 600 things 32
I am going to undertake a major life project today. I expect to have it completed by the end of the summer. The goal is simple: I am going to discard/donate/sell-off my possessions until there are only six hundred of them. This, of course, implies that I will be making an inventory (at the end). I plan to exempt consumable items like food, toilet paper, toothpaste, soap, etc, but a fork will be an item just like my air conditioner. I have yet to make decisions like whether my right stereo speaker and the wire that connects it to my receiver consitutes one or two items, but I will.
Why? Affluenza. Consumerism. I want to free the world of it.
I have been reading a fascinating collection of essays entitled Hooked: Buddhist Writings on Greed, Desire, and the Urge to Consume. ISBN: 1-59030-172-2. One of the essayists describes a friend of who is the CEO of an investment bank who conducted this exercise in his own life, that is, he reduced and inventoried his personal possessions until they were limited to 600 items. The essayist describes his friend's midtown apartment as elegant and calm, it being clear that every single item in the household has a purpose and is valued and cared for.
That hit me like the proverbial brick to the head. I look around my place and mostly what I see are things that I haven't even handled in years beyond running a duster over them. I don't want them, I notice I resent my (contrived and internally manufactured) obligation to manage them.
The essayist furhter goes on to relate that his friend must very carefully consider every new acquistion of a material item because in order to take posssession of it he has to choose something else to discard/donate/sell. That's the kind of mindful life that I endeavor to lead.
I noticed the other day when I was washing my dishes I have 31 forks. I don't think I have ever purchased a single fork in my entire life. I have acquired all of these forks by inheriting them from deceased family members or roommates who moved out without taking them.
What does owning 31 forks do for me? It allows me to pile up dishes in the sink rather than washing them as I use them. I do occasionally have dinner guests, but never more than three at a time. Therefore, I have 27 extra forks. I don't have enough room in the slot in my flatware container for all the forks, they always spill over to the spoon slot or the knife spot. This is mindlessness.
I still have seven one-gallon paint cans in my utility closet left over from the housepainting I did in 2003. I have been housing this fire and chemical contamination hazard for three years now for no reason other than mindlessness. I have a Trinitron computer monitor sitting on the floor next to my desk which I will never use again. I have four non-working lamps. I live in a neatly stacked, dusted, dumpster with clean surfaces and floors.
It's time to take out the trash.
If an investment banker can live with 600 items, I can too.
I will first make a very detailed sweep of my entire apartment getting rid of everything I know immediately that I do not want. I will recycle or donate everything that can be. I will discard the rest. I do not know how long this will take but I will chonicle it here. I am literally going to start in the southeast corner of my apartment and proceed in a clockwise fashion until I have made it back to the southeast corner. I think if I try to discriminate by room, or function, or anything like that I am going to get lost by my ego discrimination, e.g., "Let's get the hall closet done today!"
Once I have done that, I will again start in the southeast corner and begin the inventory which I will keep in a spreadsheet (Open Office, of course) which will eventually be ported into mySQL on my home server for maintenance and reporting. I'll let MySQL count it for me and I will begin the process, if necessary (and I assume at this point it most certainly will be), of choosing what to discard/donate/sell to get the number to 600. I'll probably make a web project out of this and post it all somewhere, but I'll figure out the details of that bridge when I am ready to cross it.
Liberation from the tyranny of my material possessions will be fun.
I mentioned above that I wanted to free the world of consumerism yet I have only discussed my own liberation. As I have a number of friends trying to realize the emptiness of self I just want to point out that this distinction, between freeing myself of consumerism and freeing the world of consumerism, is illusory. One cannot do one without doing the other. But, one must also realize that it is like endeavoring not to move or think during sitting zazen. We sit every time with the intention to not move or think. We fail every time.
That's why we call it practice.
for me (Score:1)
Re:for me (Score:2)
Re:for me (Score:2)
Re:for me (Score:2)
This morning... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Picture a serene life (Score:2)
This is an awesome quote. :-)
Personally I would consider the speaker and wire as one unit, as long as they are attached and function together: getting rid of the speaker wires makes the speakers useless. Most likely the stereo they are attached to could be part of the one item as well, since none of them work without the rest of the items. However, the drawer full of extra speaker wires should be inventoried, with each pair of wire
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That sounds like a LOT of work. (Score:2)
These two items, the weight-loss and the possession shedding are two facets of the same issue. Doing one *is* doing the other. I don't exactly know how to put this into words, but I'm not sure I can be successful at one without success in the other.
Thanks again for your generous heart.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:That sounds like a LOT of work. (Score:2)
Both the
Re: (Score:2)
I love this idea. (Score:2)
I wonder how the number 600 was derived. I also think it would be harder for women. For instance, I have 16 bras. Hmm, that sucks...I'm already behind the guys. Also, women are expected to have more shoes and whatnot. A guy can get by with 2-3 pairs of shoes. The minimum most women who dress up and dress down could have is about 5. No, I'm being serious...Guys can get away with wearing 1 pair of "dressy" shoes with every suit t
easy solution (Score:1)
Re:I love this idea. (Score:2)
Re:I love this idea. (Score:2)
Right. Five. That's exactly what I was saying. Guys can easily get away with 2 or 3 (I know guys who have 1 "normal" pair of shoes and 1 "dressy" pair.) We need 5, minimum.
If I never had to wear a dress I could get by with three pairs of sandals (black,
Re:I love this idea. (Score:2)
Re:I love this idea. (Score:2)
It'll make for a clean apartment, though. (Score:2)
Re:I love this idea. (Score:1)
I see that along that same lines as the forks. You have that many so you don't have to do the wash as often, it's all about convenience. If the number of items you own was important to you, you would be able to get rid of most of those bras. I get by just fine with two regular bras and two sports bras and lots of washing.
Re:I love this idea. (Score:2)
Another thing I've been thinking about - I'm married with children and there's lots of stuff we all (or at least the Doctress and I) use regularly. T
Digital Posessions (Score:2)
I was discussing it with my flatmate, and we came to the question of set. Do snowshoes count as one or two? I argued one, because they are a functional set. I'm not sure if this is true to the form or spirit of the process, though. Where do you draw the line? Is it eight forks, or is it a single set? What about the dining set? Are these considerations, or am I
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Digital Posessions (Score:1)
But do we? Really?
The hairsplitting can be significant. Socks obviously come in pairs, so we all "know" that a pair of socks count as one item. But is my computer one item? Or do you count the five hard drives, DVD burner, two digital TV cards, case, wireless keyboard and wireless mouse individually? If it is about consumerism, should we count anything beyond the "basics" as seperate items? If so, a wired keyboard and mouse are included, but the wirless pair I have should
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Digital Posessions (Score:2)
Re:Digital Posessions (Score:2)
Many/most people don't care about liner notes or artwork, but some of us hardcore music geeks do :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Great Idea (Score:2)
I ended up having a lot more to say (Score:1)
books don't count, right? (Score:2)
In the spirit of this exercise (Score:2)