Slashdot Log In
Humorously Bad Web Hosting Policies
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Wed Dec 27, 2000 04:28 PM
from the thats-pretty-damn-funny dept.
from the thats-pretty-damn-funny dept.
retard2112 writes "In the Terms of Service for pagecreators.net I found this about halfway through.
D. You agree not to post any type of review about Page Creators at any time anywhere on the web. This includes any statement good or bad. You understand you will be held liable for damages of no more than fifty-thousand dollars if a review is found and traced back to yourself. What is up with that?" I ought to make a Slashdot Terms of Service thing like that where I get to hold the dude who posts goat trolls all day from behind a law firm's firewall liable for $50k! Seriously tho', that's pretty nasty. Larry Ellison would be proud.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Humorously Bad Web Hosting Policies
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 282 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
More Info (Score:4)
"ceased to operate"?? (Score:4)
Did they just get /.-ed or what?
-bluebomber
Interesting (Score:5)
Pagecreators is a SCAM! (Score:5)
PageCreators is run by an 18yr old who is scamming people of thousands of dollars, by charging $1/kb of traffic. In some cases, he has falsified logs to show higher traffic. One person had such a small page, that they would have needed over 800,000 visitors to generate the traffic that Page Creators charged their credit card for.
The punk who runs it has a lawyer (or someone pretending to be a lawyer) who routinely sends threatening letters to sites that post bad reviews.
What That Policy Aims to Stop ... (Score:3)
Google Cache of TOS (Score:4)
Google's Cache of their TOS [google.com]
the first rule of Page Creators (Score:5)
Posted about this already (Score:4)
What I found extremely interesting was that I couldn't find the terms of service anywhere. I actually signed up for an account (old CC number, so it wouldn't go thru) but at no time was I actually even offered the option of seeing what I was agreeing to.
The Wired article pointed out that for 'unlimited' bandwidth, you were actually charged $1/k for traffic over a sustained transfer rate of
I guess their point was yes, it's unlimited bandwidth, but that doesn't mean you'll only pay $24.95/month (or whatever the rate was).
I was very surprised the guy lasted as long as he did, charging people THOUSANDS of dollars, then defending himself by saying they didn't 'understand the technical nature of hosting', etc. Wouldn't the banks get suspicious? You have 200 charges of $24.95/month for 18 months, then 3 charges of $10,000, then hundreds more $24.95s. I think that SHOULD raise some eyebrows, just like my CC usage causes calls from the CC company occasionally - "you've never charged anything over $200 in the past 10 years we've known you, and you just charged $10,000 in 5 different states in 10 minutes. Is everything OK?"
PageCreators has bigger problems than bad TOS (Score:3)
In a similar note, the last company I worked for had as part of their NDA a nondisparagement clause. "You agree not to talk smack about The Company, its business practices, its officers, etc etc". Anybody know how enforecable such an agreement is, especially for people who are no longer with the company? Seems questionable to me.
Another *interesting* point in their TOS (Score:5)
From Pagecreator's TOS:
C. Copywritten Files
1. Files found on Page Creator's servers which are found to be copywritten will be removed and the account cancelled immediately without prior notification to the customer. All copyright owners will be notified accordingly.
Notice how they don't say anything about only removing files that illegally violate copyright! Any piece of work is immediately copyrighted when the author creates it. This means that each and every page that is on Pagecreators site should be removed according to their TOS. (The funny thing is that it looks like they've complied with this by taking down their entire site.) ;P
From an earlier Wired story (Score:4)
"Usage: 9057kbp/s, Debited: $9057, Due $0. Please let us know if you have any questions about these charges. Thank you for your business!"
His wife e-mailed the company to let them know there had been a mistake.
Page Creators responded that the charges were in accordance with the contract "$1 per 1kbp/s" in "usage."
McCabe ran the traffic tracking program provided for the website. He couldn't make out anything about Kbps, but he did see that the site had received a grand total of 48 hits all year.
After subsequent requests for clarifying documentation failed to bear fruit, the McCabes informed Page Creators that they had disputed the charge with their credit card company and threatened to report the company for fraud.
PC's response:
"Do as you wish, we have proof of your usage and will take it to the maximum extent needed. Check with the Attorney General of Minnesota, you will see our point. We will also provide Visa/MasterCard with the proper documentation. There is a fee of $150 per disputed charge which will be handled in small claims court in Minnesota. We will immediately file claim for suit if you dispute these charges with your credit card company."
Others report receiving similar threats of litigation when they questioned charges.
McCabe was incensed.
"This kid literally dared me to call the attorney general because he thinks he's untouchable. I've now made it my personal hobby to get him brought to justice."
...
Travis Gochenaur, a 23-year-old from Wisconsin who says Page Creators attempted to hit him with over $7,000 in illegitimate charges, wonders why the company hasn't been shut down. Last April, Gochenaur signed up for PC's "monthly special" that offered Web hosting for just $200 a year. In June, Gochenaur says he received a cryptic "invoice" from Kruchten saying he was being charged $1,000 for
"It felt like there was a little kid using my credit card like a candy jar," he said.
After gathering his evidence, Gochenaur called the Alexandria police and sent them his evidence. Eventually, they informed him that they were passing the case on the state attorney general. Four months later, he can't believe that Page Creators is still operating.
So Wired couldn't touch them. But fifteen seconds into their Slashdotting, they're off the web and probably going to be sucessfully sued by the people whose webpages they are no longer able to serve. Interesting.
Steven
Re:Perhaps they don't want to be held to ransom. (Score:5)
I'm not sure I agree with that. Sure, I say to not do business with them (especially as it seems they have "ceased to operate) but I am also not sure how legal that is. One thing that the person that wrote this article mentions is fair use, which is protection of the consumers' rights when dealing with companies. Fiar use has been trampled on quite a bit recently by big businesses who like your point of view.
To take your logic further, if I sell televisions I can put something in a contract for my customers to sign that if they complain about the TV once I get to kill them. This would be illegal, even if noone had bought a TV from me. I'm not a lawyer so I can't give all the correct terms, but you can see that it would be clearly wrong.
The reason that it is not right, or legal for a company to say you can't review them if you are a customer is that it could infringe on your free speech. There are limits to what you can do against a company. You can't use their logo or give information that may be confidential or proprietary to their business if you agreed not to previously. However, simply saying, "This webhost company sucks ass and gave me bad service" should not be able to get you in trouble. Also, if the company wished, why would they stop at reviews? Wouldn't contacting the Better Business Bureau be considered a breach of the terms of service as well? There are limits set up both ways, to protect the consumer and the businesses. Unfortunately the consumer's rights are going down the toilet as big businesses lie to us and the politicians representing us so they can get more of an advantage to take more of our money.
Pagecreators.net's Service Agreement (Score:5)
SERVICES AGREEMENT I. Mission Statement A. Page Creators provides Internet World Wide Web page hosting. Page Creators has certain legal and ethical responsibilities regarding the use of its servers and equipment involved in these services. B. Page Creator's general policy is to act as a provider of Internet presence. Page Creators has specific ethical concerns regarding the use of its computers as detailed below. C. Page Creators guarantees to respond to any and all e-mails regarding any question or problem you have with our service no later than 36 hours after said e-mail is sent. This guarantee does not apply to lost deliveries due to outside network problems. II. 99.9% Uptime Guarantee A. Service Level - Page Creators endeavors to have the content of your web site available for http access by any part in the world 99.9% of the time. B. Coverage - This 99.9% uptime guarantee applies to any Page Creators client in good financial standing with Page Creators at the time of a service outage. C. Credits 1. In the event that your web site is not available for more than 99.9% of the time, Page Creators will give you a credit on the following month's service fee as follows: a. For any shared hosting client, such credit shall be retroactive to the first day of the month in which the access was denied, and shall be as calculated below and as measured 24 hours a day in a calendar month, with the maximum credit not to exceed the monthly service charge for the affected month. Page Creators offers this guarantee to every month-to-month customer. b. Monthly Uptime Credit. 95% to 99.8% shall govern a 25% credit. 90% to 94.9%% shall govern a 50% credit. 89.9% or below shall govern a 100% credit. 2. In order for you to receive a credit on your account, you must request the credit within ten (10) days after you experienced the down time. a. Your request must be made by sending an electronic mail message to noc@pagecreators.net. b. For security purposes, the body of this message must contain your account user name, the dates and times of the unavailability of your web site, and such other customer identification requested by Page Creators. 3. Credits will be applied within ten (10) days of your credit request. As a courtesy to our month-to-month customers, an in-house credit to your account shall be your sole and exclusive remedy in the event of an outage. D. Restrictions on Credits - Credits shall not be provided to you in the event that you have any outage resulting from the following: 1. Scheduled maintenance as posted from time to time at Page Creators; 2. Your behavior or the performance or failure of your equipment, facilities or applications; 3. Circumstances beyond Page Creator's reasonable control, including, without limitation, acts of any governmental body, war, insurrection, sabotage, embargo, fire, flood, strike or other labor disturbance, interruption of or delay in transportation, delay in telecommunications or third party services including backbone provider, DNS propagation, domain name registration / transfer, failure of third party software or hardware or inability to obtain raw materials, supplies, or power used in or equipment needed for provision of your web site; or 4. A client breaking any item in Page Creator's this agreement causing a machine to fail as a result. III. Miscellaneous Provisions A. Acceptable Bandwidth Use and Unacceptable Overuse Clause 1. Bandwidth is a term used to describe the total traffic your web site and other services associated with the use of your website consume. 2. We do not monitor traffic until you surpass the specified amount with your package at the time of purchase in one months period of time. This does not apply to provision III, A, 3. 3. In the event you consume more than 30kbp/s of sustained peak traffic within any 24 hour period of time, for any month, a fee of $1 per 1kbp/s will be billed to your account via the payment method used upon sign up. 4. You agree to pay Page Creators this $1 per 1kbp/s fee for bandwidth overages and you understand this fee is not refundable under any circumstance. 5. WARNING- You also understand that wusage statistics are not accurate enough for you to determine your own total bandwidth usage, as it does not include the following: e-mail transfer, httpd or ftp downloads from webpage, anonymous FTP downloads, CGI scripts, Real Audio, Real Video, Telnet, and SSH, as well as other items. 6. If you have any questions on this policy, contact us prior to signing up. 7. All customers who occur bandwidth overages will be e-mailed a receipt regarding the overages to the e-mail address provided upon sign up. 8. Client paying by credit card will be billed prior to invoice being sent. 9. Clients paying by credit card agree to accept charges for bandwidth overages. B. Background Running Programs 1. We may allow programs to run continually in the background. These are considered on a one-to-one basis and an extra charge will be incurred based on system resources used and operational maintenance needed. 2. You must notify Page Creators prior to the installation of any background running programs. The final consent and total fee must be arranged. C. New Domain Name Registration 1. The customer who registers for services is the legal owner of any domain name registered. 2. Page Creators reserves the right to seize any domain name at any time for the following reasons: a. Placing dispute with customer's credit card institution on any payment debited by Page Creators; and b. Violation of any provision of this service agreement. D. Disk Storage 1. The intention of Page Creators is to provide a large space to serve web documents, not to provide an off-site storage area for electronic files. 2. All (90%) of your web pages must be 'linked' with files (.gif,
Another thing that will never stand up in court. (Score:3)
This is potential fun... ;) (Score:4)
(This business idea has been patented with little trouble; as long as I use lynx (and the keyboard), I don't violate the infamous one-click patent...)
Re:Pagecreators is a SCAM! (Score:3)
Using that math, he would only be required to generate 1/1000th of that, or 800, visitors, which is well within the realm of possibility.
Ummm...
Last time I checked, a bit was only 1/8 byte, not 1/1000. By the math, he would still have needed to get 100,000 visitors, which is not within the realm of possibility.
Anyway, do you actually think that people would pay a lawyer to read every damn click-license that thye come accross on the web. I think not. It seems to me this kid is trying out as much legalese and restrictions as he can, in the hopes that one of his schemes will work and he'll get a bunch of money.
Re:"ceased to operate"?? (Score:5)
Google [google.com]
cache of their contact us page
Toll free sales :
U.S.&nbs p;
1-877-336-4472
INTERN. 320-762-7003
Toll free tech support: 888-382-4994
Fax US and INTERNATIONAL: 320-762-9060
Toll Free huh? As in he get's billed for the long distance time?
I think I have a few sales questions for him...
-ct
Oooo, very cute (Score:3)
So their doing of scheduled maintenance makes you not qualify for credit :) tres cute :)
Re:This is potential fun... ;) (Score:3)
$ telnet pagecreators.net
Trying 209.123.201.131...
Connected to pagecreators.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
Red Hat Linux release 6.1 (Cartman)
Kernel 2.2.12-20 on an i686
login:
Somewhat ironic.
- Sam
Fraud detector (patent applied for) (Score:4)
Re:Pagecreators is a SCAM! (Score:3)
Not only that, but the terms weren't even in the fine print. Customers complained that the contract mysteriously changed, to add a 'subject to change without notice' and 'price is +$1/kb when usage is above 300kb'.
In the wired article, most customers didn't read the small print. But those who did, and signed hard copies, report that those clauses weren't on the contracts they signed.
MPAA, RIAA Claim Credit for Pagecreators Contract (Score:5)
The TOS agreement, which forbids any criticism of the webhosting company, was hailed by Jack Valenti as "a sterling example of the bold future available to all content providers."
"It was a long shot actually," said Valenti. "We were getting pretty pissed off about all the flak we were getting about DeCSS- and Napster-related lawsuits, and so we were just blue-skying one day about what to do. The idea came up, and since everyone was coked up at the time we just went with it, you know? We found a pissant little webhosting service, offered the contract, and waited to see how far it would go."
"We had no idea it would be so successful," he added. "But we're definitely happy it did."
A spokesman for the two agencies would not speculate further on where the agreement might be used next. When asked just how far punishment for criticism would go, he replied cryptically, "Just watch us."
Free Software Foundation programmer and founder Richard M. Stallman could not be reached for comment. Said a source close to him, "He's desperately grepping all the click-wrap agreements on his hard drive."
Re:Another *interesting* point in their TOS (Score:3)
Verbatim? That won't stand up to any courtroom
scrutiny! "Copywritten" means "written by a professional writer for advertising or publicity copy".
"copyright" or "copyrighted"means the exclusive legal right to reproduce, publish, and sell the matter and form (as of a literary, musical, or artistic work)
Credit cards are the key to scams ... (Score:5)
Whenever you give your credit card number, you're handing over your wallet and telling the merchant to go ahead and serve himself. Although the credit card companies pretend that they regulate the merchants making charges, the scope for monkey business is astronomous.
The most dangerous merchants are, surprisingly, the bigger ones, like telephone companies and other utilities, and these are pushing for everybody to use credit cards.
I'm trying, however, to stop using credit cards altogether.
Since I live in Europe, and I'm quite lucky that most European consumers (and most smaller merchants too, because all transactions are registered, and handed down to the tax authorities) share this deep resentment for credit cards with me.
The more people use credit cards, the more I will be forced to use a credit cards. In the end, I'm not even going to be able to get a phone service, unless "I hand over my wallet".
Therefore, I would like to urge everybody to refrain from using credit cards as much as you can.
learn, learn, learn! (Score:5)
Has any lawyer ever done this before? (Score:5)
IX. Disclaimer
D. Page Creators reserves the right to revise its policies at any time without notice. It is the customer's responsibility to monitor pagecreators.net/contract for policy changes.
Excuse me? It's my responsibility to monitor changes in a contract? BZZZZ! Wrong. You sign and agree to a contract, that's legit. But to create a clause that says NOT ONLY that the contract can be modified without notice BUT ALSO that one must adhere to the contract reguardless of whether or not the participant/s agreed to it without proper closure is not legal BY ANY MEANS.
One signs the TOS agreement. Legal. TOS agreement modified. Legal. Direct or written notification of change in TOS. Legal. (Why do you think banks, insurance agencies, credit card companies, and all other businesses write letters to you giving "Notification" over some business transaction?) If participant is not happy with TOS modification, the service can be terminated. Legal. But to modify a TOS without express notification to participants is not.
No doubt this is a scam.
The second rule of Page Creators... (Score:3)
If you move out we'll slam you with another bill (Score:4)
5. A fee of $200 will be applied to your account if Page Creators does not receive proper cancellation request yet you move your site to another provider. This fee is not refundable. You give Page Creators authorization to charge your credit card this amount (if applicable payment method).
HAHA that's the funniest piece of crap I've seen in a long time. Not even aitcom nor 9netave can beat that!
*** Where he lives *** (Score:3)
His fax number listed on whois.net reverse lookup is registered to:
Rose Johnson
105 Linden Ave
Alexandria, MN 56308
Phone: 320-762-9060
Re:Another *interesting* point in their TOS (Score:3)
>I wonder what the legality of a term like
>copywritten is. It's obvious that he meant
>copyrighted, but how would a court of law
>interpret a contract with such terms?
Depends on the state. In Texas, a judge would,
or would direct a jury to, strike that clause from the agreement and not consider it germane
to the case.
One invalid clause in a contract does not invalidate the contract, only that one clause.
That means for instance, if a landlord has put something illegal or unenforceable in the lease,
it doesn't mean you don't have to pay rent or change the smoke alarm battery, etc.
On the other hand, if it were "obvious" in intent, and the parties both agreed that the
word "copywritten" was construed to mean "copyrighted", then the clause could stand.
Re:Another thing that will never stand up in court (Score:3)
so much for freedom of speech and freedom to choose.
Such as the freedom not to buy it in the first place? (checks) No, you've still got that. Vote with your wallet.
--
Re:Pagecreators is a SCAM! (Score:3)
That'll teach me to try and post intelligently when the Coke machine at the office is broken. ;-)
Re:Oooo, very cute (Score:3)
So, if you piss them off (like keep calling for tech support, as mentioned in one of the complaints), they can just shut off your service, and it doesn't get covered by the 99.9% agreement.
Cute.
-Jeff
Re:This is potential fun... ;) (Score:3)
Someone pointed out that all of the machines in the domain appear to be running default-install 6.1 release with all the default services enabled.
This has to scream 'crack me!' If he doesn't bother turning off telnet or at least customizing the welcome message, there's little doubt he has kept up with security patches.
Cute... (Score:4)
------------------
Sure you are.
----- Original Message -----
From: Travis Roy
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 4:40 PM
Subject: Terms of service request
Can you please send me a copy of your terms of service. I'm looking for a web provider.
--
Site down, so CALL HIM!!! (Score:5)
Since his page is somehow down now and it seems that he doesn't answer email, I looked him up [uswestdex.com]. If you're as angry as I am, send him a note, or give him a call. He's listed under his parent's number (he's only 18)
Kruchten Paul & Debbie... (320) 762-0538
1213 Lark St Alexandria MN 56308
Be nice though.
Re:Perhaps they don't want to be held to ransom. (Score:3)
>grow up to be another rip-off artist
He'll have to, if he expects to survive in prison.
That could be very dangerous. (Score:5)
Penguins with perfect credit ratings. The Linux Pimp [thelinuxpimp.com]
Re:"ceased to operate"?? (Score:3)
but the server still answers up nicely to my ping tool.
See?
# - IP address - Host name --- Round trip time
1 - 209.123.201.131 www.pagecreators.net 152 ms
2 - 209.123.201.131 www.pagecreators.net 137 ms
3 - 209.123.201.131 www.pagecreators.net 127 ms
Maybe their http port crashed. Could somebody check this out?
;-)
But we could always bring it to the attention of their service provider:
IP block lookup for 209.123.201.131
whois -h whois.arin.net 209.123.201.131
Net Access Corporation (NETBLK-NAC-NETBLK02)
110 South Jefferson Road
Newton, NJ 07860
Netname: NAC-NETBLK02
Netblock: 209.123.0.0 - 209.123.255.255
Maintainer: NAC
Coordinator:
....
Pavely, Ryan (RP2938-ARIN)
abuse@nac.net
800-net-me36 (FAX) 973-590-5080 (FAX) 201-983-0453
Record last updated on 10-Sep-1999.
Database last updated on 27-Dec-2000
18:20:42 EDT.
MSN, Yahoo - All have the same TOS change policy (Score:3)
If this term is a scam then most internet companies use the same scam of assigning you the responsibility of checking for modifications to the agreement and that your continued use is your consent to the changes.
I've included excerpts from yahoo and msn but you can find the others by clicking on the TOS link that are at the bottom of most major internet sites
MSN: [msn.com]
Yahoo: [yahoo.com]Call me mad ... (Score:3)
... but I found this part of their contract as a rather good contract clause:
If just every company could have that kind of spam policy, I would feel rather happy