I seem to recall that when roundup-ready soybeans (or quite possibly I'm thinking of another variety) appeared on the market, it had the infertile seeds as a way to force farmers to buy new seed every year. It seems that this is no longer the case or I am thinking of another roundup-ready crop.

If an organic farmer is located relatively close to a conventional farmer with GMO crops and they take no precautions about contamination which leads to a not-certified organic crop, it's their own fault. Similarly for a conventional farmer being contaminated by an organic crop which leads to decreased yields - it's their own fault. Contamination between nearby fields is to be expected, and if it something a farmer wants to avoid, they need to take action to stop it. If contamination happens over a larger distance than can be reasonably expected, it's not the farmers fault, but is the result and fault of unexpected weather, which isn't the contaminating farmer's fault either.

And the organic crop, while ruined in the sense that it is no longer organic, is not ruined in the sense of total desolation. The farmer still has a crop they can sell (and because of the GMO influence it probably will have higher yields), they just can't sell it at the higher organic rate. And if it is economically worthwhile for them to grow organic crops, they have an economic incentive to take steps to prevent contamination. If it is too expensive to prevent that, and they will not relocate, it may no longer be economically feasible for them to attempt to raise organic crops.

I believe that's because the roundup-ready crops produce infertile seed.

It's not like the Europeans are complete opposed to genetic engineering and genetically modified crops. They're okay with 'natural' genetic engineering and manipulation that farmers have been doing for millennia. It's not like modern agricultural products exist in the wild - they are the end result of genetic selection and manipulation via breeding. But newer, faster, more efficient manipulation is going to kill the people that eat it.

I recommend reading about Norman Borlaug and how his aggressive wheat manipulation and cross-breeding saved millions of lives from starvation.

That describes some forms of Female Genital Mutilation, not all of them.

Male circumcision is certainly comparable to removing the clitoral hood, which is a type of FGM.