"This title is no longer available and has been removed from your library"

I'll get to watch more line fight videos and people behaving badly in public ;-D

Better yet, they might get around to blowing us all up! At least we'd have something decent to watch on TV ;-D

We are terraforming the planet for Lizard people. Don't ya know? ;-D

Its a hard no from US. ;-)

From Google: "A direct fatal overdose from pure psilocybin is biologically rare because the compound has low physiological toxicity."

This WILL lead to some of the largest wrongful death lawsuits EVER paid out by a city or municipality. Period. This shit IS NOT ready for primetime folks. Not when LIVES are on the line. SMH!

Won't be hacking any of those then. ;-)

His hands off approach of what is potentially the most dangerous technology since the Nuke, was wrong? Huh... Who knew? ;-D

For me not buying one then also. ;-D

He has blown one up on the pad, and launched zero successfully. NASA = "Sounds Great! Lets give em a contract!"

Whoo, Grok butchered that one ;-D

We also have molecular rotary motors (such as the bacterial flagellar motor) that can spin at 20,000+ RPM, reverse direction in milliseconds, and convert energy to mechanical work at near-100% efficiency with almost no waste heat. Biology is extraordinarily complex, and there is still a great deal of functional engineering at the cellular and molecular scale that we have not replicated in our technology. I agree that new discoveries continue to reveal more layers of that complexity. Where we may differ is on the trajectory of technological complexity. Rapid, even super-exponential growth in specific domains (particularly compute and AI hardware) is currently observable and measurable. Whether that continues effectively unending on human timescales, without hitting physical, material, energetic, or economic constraints, is a projection rather than established fact â" I take your point there. On raw computational capacity, though, the comparison is already striking. Recent estimates put total global installed peak computing capacity (smartphones, PCs, data centers, AI accelerators, etc.) at roughly 3x10^{22} FLOPS. A single human brainâ(TM)s equivalent throughput is estimated in the 10^{15} to 10^{18} range depending on the model used. That puts collective human technology at roughly 10,000Ã-- to tens of millions of times the FLOPS capacity of any one brain, with the gap still widening in the compute domain. The interesting question is how we define and measure âoecomplexityâ going forward â" raw operations per second, integrated autonomous systems, energy efficiency, self-repair and self-assembly, or something else? Biology remains the gold standard on several of those axes for now. I expect technological systems to eventually surpass it on additional dimensions as well, potentially by very large margins. The more cohesive and focused response, is appreciated. More productive. And to that, I become more flexible in my assertions. Kudos.

You still failed to address the large volume of data presented against your argument. Almost entirely. Citations, studies, centuries of science... That you are "Choosing" to ignore to engage in whatever you think this is. Honestly. This is squarely in the realm of "You problem" do more research? Use a SINGLE citation or piece of science beyond just throwing up a like to the second law of thermodynamics? Its a HUGE cop-out. And I knew you were not a serious person when you did it. As a subject I've personally studied in detail for over 20 years, I can bring the science to the table. And have. You are just flatly ignoring it to troll. Noted. Rejected.

And honestly, thats rich for someone who ignored or chose to not address, 95%+ of the counterpoints made against your argument. You need a new mirror...