Re:Only confusing the stupid ones (Score 0)

Your declaring that you had or have evidence is, well, not convincing. Simply chanting this line is not science-it is, well, religion. Obviously you do not have any. "Lots of good evidence" that you have seems to be lacking in your response.

When one has actual evidence, they present it. You and I both know yours never passes the sniff test, and can't. So you do not present it.

Thus far in history, to date, there has never bee a scrap of unambiguous evidence discovered which can not be explained by a Creator.

NOTHING happens by accident. Simple as that. Called a LAW, not a theory.

I can defend my statement that evolutionism is useless, unproductive deadly, dangerous and purely religious. You cannot defend yours.

ALL evidence in science points to incredible, intelligent design, from the simplest cell to humans. I noticed that you did not answer which of the four scenarios best fits how you believe we got here. Non-committal?

Here's a new one. Start with a tadpole and explain metamorphism into a frog from purely evolutionary means. Or take flight in four groups and explain how it naturally happend.

"Abandon religion. Abandon Evil-utionism."

Regards,
Zukester