Two weeks ago:

Also two weeks ago:

Coup de grace:

So using your 'math', what is your projection for your projected death total in US from corona is going to be in two weeks?

February 4: State of the Union Address, Trump calls corona virus a 'threat' and vows 'to take all necessary steps to safeguard citizens from' it. Pelosi rips up the speech because it's all 'pack of lies'.

I know the governor (D), with help from media, has furiously backtracked it but let's go to the original wording of the order:

Is that actual numbers from the paper? Only relevant numbers from abstract are these:

Only things to glean from these are that: 129 cars out of 461 cars yielded (27.98%); 51 yields in 212 tries for males (24.06%); 78 yields in 249 tries for females (31.33%); 72 yields in 231 tries for whites (31.17%); 57 yields in 230 tries for non-whites (24.78%). After that you can put any number in for particular demographic (as long as you don't exceed total yields) and adjust numbers accordingly to make the math work. For example: 51 yields in 51 tries for white males (100%); 0 yields in 161 tries for black males (0%); 21 yields in 180 tries for white females (11.67%); 57 yields in 69 tries for black females (82.61%).

I was interested in what percentage of global warming skeptic video this study deemed as containing misinformation in comparison to what percentage of video that agrees with "scientific consensus" had misinformation in it. So I read the full report. Well, there is no comparison because there is no number for the latter. In fact their definition for videos that "contained misinformation" is:

So if you make a video claiming humanity will go extinct in 2020 or that global warming is a ploy by Reptilians to take over the earth, this study will not consider that misinformation. It is more accurate to say "Avaaz found that 16 percent of the top 100 related videos surfaced by the search term "global warming" contained thing that goes against their agenda."

I typed "slashdot.org" in to URL bar but I seemed to have ended up in Democratic Underground.

But I thought liberals think Internet Archive cannot be trusted because it can be fabricated?

Last Republican mayor of Seattle:
James d'Orma Braman 1969
Last Republican mayor of Memphis:
John Loague 1876


"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

It didn't even occur to me that shouting "pakuri" could mean he was angry about his work being stolen till English media started translating it as such. It is so common for these otaku types to get frothing-at-mouth mad over accusation of some works being a rip-off. "Pakuri" is just a word people like to use to disparage something or someone. Every work is to some extent derivative and "pakuri" has basically lost its meaning at this point.

More like propaganda website.

One egregious example is their 'fact checking' on provocateur Nathan Phillips: Did Nathan Phillips Falsely Claim He Was a Vietnam Veteran?

In it's fact-checking Snopes acknowledge the existence of a video where Phillips clearly states "I'm a Vietnam vet". They also freely admit Phillips was never deployed to Vietnam. You would think at this point they will conclude that it's true and call it a day. But this goes against their agenda so after eight paragraph worth of torturous argument they conclude that it's unproven.

The Internet is free and open.

If you ever wondered how anyone will continue to believe in doomsday cult after supposed day of rapture come and goes with nothing happening, just look at "net neutrality" folks still bravely fighting to save the internet.

Yeah, 'temporarily dismissed' for 6 months? Who gives a shit. Oh but furloughed for 3 weeks, THE HUMANITY!

Some will take the buyout offers, some will be 'transferred' and some will be 'temporarily' dismissed (all of them will be rehired after 6 months, I pinky promise, I'm CEO of megacorporation why would I lie?) so 'there will be zero job losses'. Yeah, not buying it. But when the inevitable layoff happens, nobody will care about that article. They'll just blame Trump.

Ford fact checks Trump: We will be here forever CNN(September 15, 2016):

Ford to Lay Off 2,000 Workers for Ranger, Bronco Retooling(March 5, 2018):

Who knew liberals considered parroting evil corporations' lies to be real news.

Really? I still can find it mentioned in these:
The future is here: iPhone X
iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus: A new generation of iPhone
Not to mention they still hosts the video of presentation that introduced AirPower and it still has Phil Schiller introducing it (@1:43:00 from apple special event September 12, 2017).

Either Apple is bad at searching their own website or this is a clickbaity article.

I heard Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, on 2017 net income of $45.6 billion, paid $0 to Santa Clara County, that's a tax rate of 0.000%. Man, these mega corporations are evil. But I also heard some mom & pop store in Portland paid $0 to Santa Clara County, that is also a tax rate of 0.000%. So maybe all business are evil?

Or maybe Apple's $48.35 billion net income is a result of doing business all over the globe and as a result don't pay all of its taxes in Santa Clara County?