Yeah, ok buddy. What you fail to mention is that the RnA research failed. Miserably. In the animal testing stage not to mention humans. It didn't even make it out of animal clinical trials. Look it up I dare you, you won't because you're gas lit and have no argument or self determination...
Pfizer et.al needed emergency authorization to experiment on human guinea pigs..and they got it!
Luckily there are plenty of guinea pig IQ level humans out there..

You have none.
You have MSM gaslighting. No research to link to.
I linked to actual scientific papers above from brave people in the medical profession that often get censored or cancelled for speaking the truth. You link in with MSM hysteria and gas lighting. That's the difference.

I just referenced a whole load of scientific literature.
slashdot mod points doesn't make you right. You're a god damn idiot ...
Read the citations I posted. I didn't write them. Doctors did. You know, actual Doctors, who get censored serving imbeciles like you that throw it all away..
Dr. Faucci is not a medical doctor in a traditional sense, he's just a faker, an imposter, a fraud ..like you..

I've read several if your low IQ posts, just gas lit MSM minion hysteria.
..
Reference a study, imbecile. You have no platform, just fear porn. Coronavirus type viruses mutate too rapidly and always have done. No vaccine against them can work.

Yeah ok buddy. I don't trust any of them.
But Astrazenica, Sputnik and other Adeno based vaccines come out of your system over time.
RnA vaccines alter the way your body works. They reprogram your immune system to actually produce the spike proteins. Look it up. I'm tired of doing your work for you when you don't really care to know the truth.
Rna Vaccines work very similarly to how the technology is described in this paper. only worse!
Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery
They could never have got these into public circulation without emergency (bum rush) approbal

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152500161930053X
Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery
Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery
.
I'm sorry, but that's exactly what it is. They don't even deny that ..so why is there always a minion on hand like you who does deny it?
Listen to me carefully because you are really not worth the effort: They Don't Deny That ... Period...
Do Your Own F***ing Research
, please

Yeah, I'm waiting for this one. The same morons that get an injection in their arm and then stick a tin-foil coated card sticks to their forehead because of surface tension and use that to claim that the vaccine "transforms" people (wtf?), or start talking about Bill Gates putting Borg nanoprobes into the vaccine (this was a thing), etc. I stand back and boggle. It's like the Flat Earthers.

..idiot..

..When low IQ posters such as yourself blend 2 unrelated conspiracy theories in order to push your straw man argument.

A. The Earth is not flat

B. Experimental RNA Covid 19 vaccines are not safe .. At all. Sorry you did that to yourself. but good luck pushing it on me. I won't comply. I will treat forced vaccination as chemical rape and exercise my rights accordingly, if push comes to shove.

Discrete Immune Response Signature to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination Versus Infection,

Large-scale study of antibody titer decay following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection

Shedding of Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Despite Vaccination, by Kasen K. Riemersma, Brittany E. Grogan, Amanda Kita-Yarbro, Gunnar E. Jeppson, David H. O’Connor, Thomas C. Friedrich, Katarina M. Grande, MedRxiv, August 24, 2021.

I'll trust my own immune system than you very much .. clown *facepalm* Stick to hot dog serving or whatever imaginary profession you work at ..

Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells, by Kristen W. Cohen, Susanne L. Linderman, Zoe Moodie, Julie Czartoski, Lilin Lai, Grace Mantus, Carson Norwood, Lindsay E. Nyhoff, Venkata Viswanadh Edara, et al. MedRxiv, April 27, 2021.

in 2021. See above from gtall

I really don't think you have researched into Pfizer. Luckily they are indemnified for COVID-19 and so can't be sued! Guess what that means, for your safety in their hands? Oh NVM..

Pfizer track record pre-emergency bum rush authorization

*Unlimited Facepalm* Tech nerds, you know nothing about medicine! Stick to*nix

So it goes from "very, very safe" to "extremely safe". While getting COVID still is basically on the safety-level of "crapshot".

Natural immunity is still (as it always has been, especially for corona-type viruses which mutate rapidly) far better than any vaccine. Your immune system is like an organic neural net that adapts to new variants. Reprogramming the immune system (which is basically what RNA shots do) is not safe....not even close, especially since it "teaches" your immune system one trick - to fight one variant, and is hence untrained in the broader set. They could do better, but that wouldn't be as profitable!

This is all about Money and Power.

References:

One-year sustained cellular and humoral immunities of COVID-19 convalescents

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections,

Study Destroys Justification for Vaccine Mandates

The Amish story

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey Technical Article: Impact [ Or Lack Thereof ] of vaccination on testing positive in the UK: October 2021

and on and on...

The durability of immunity against reinfection by SARS-CoV-2: a comparative evolutionary study

One-year sustained cellular and humoral immunities of COVID-19 convalescents

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections

An that's before we even discuss how Pfizer are completely indemnified with this track record:

Biggest ever pharma lawsuits by settlement amount: Ranking the top ten>/a>

And unable to be investigated on the full extent of harmful effects for ! FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data

Incidents of very serious complications form RNA based vaccines like Pfizer are much higher. There have also been many reported serious effects that are estimated to be from improper cold chain storage, as it has high requirements for that. RNA is the experimental vaccine technology they want to dominate and since there is no liability, its dangerously unproven (in animal studies before covid it failed miserably. It needed an emergency to get through), why not have it as the only option? They don't want person A to be slightly healthier than B due to capitalism and choice when they can have everyone in the same crippled boat. Pfizer have the worst record also on paper in terms of overall damages payout: Biggest ever pharma lawsuits by settlement amount: Ranking the top ten More traditional "delivery" like inactivated and adjuvenated vaccines are far safer and well studied, over long duration periods!! (RNA is much more than delivery, its gene editing and hence it's delivered into your body permanently) Look up the acronym if you don't know what RNA stands for. This is not that hard ..

If I travel back in time, what vaccines should I get?

Sad that even now you can't answer that, years later .. If you really have to get one, and you probably don't need one, inactivated ones are the safest. They have been around the longest, in fact they date back to China.

is a lot lower than the deaths from the genetic engineering vectored, RNA shots. (not Science there's a difference). Hmm, it's almost as if they just want you to have only one choice and not many, what ideology does that remind you of: Commu.. oh NVM. And not only one choice, but the one worst possible choice!!

A vaccine technology so safe, they had to get indemnified form legal harm, crush their competitors, cover up miocarditus and other risks, and are now in bed with and lobbying the CDC and FDA, in the biggest cozy cartel since oil in Iraq, defense, and Halliburton!! and force you to take it.

Incidents of very serious complications form RNA based vaccines like Pfizer are much higher. There have also been many reported serious effects that are estimated to be form improper cold chain as it has high requirements for that. The RNA is the vaccine they want to dominate and since there is no liability why not have it as the only option? They don't want person A to be slightly healthier than B due to capitalism and choice when they can have everyone in the same crippled boat.

References:

Judge orders release of Pfizer docs:

FDA: Pfizer Admits Myocarditis Risk for 5-12 Year-Olds Requires 5-Year Study (Page 11).