Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that is what I was doing.
I don't think what I meant came across:
You accuse people of the over-simplified viewpoint "good vs. evil" (of course, I agree that this is over-simplified), and you also just accused me of over-simplifying by using the word "hate." Yet you yourself resort to what is just as arguably an over-simplification: psychological egoism (the belief that humans are only motivated by self-interest). You present it as "reality," resorting to it in http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1357269&cid=29304575 ("We all fight for ourselves, and there is nothing strange about an organism doing this. By denying this you deny your very own existance and the chain of events which brought you here, from single cell organism to the child of your parents.") and in http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1357269&cid=29303997 ("In reality people are simply organisms looking for personal gain, and not only in monetary means. We are egoistic by nature, though we often keep a straight face, and when we think we aren't -- we still are."), and possibly others.
Claiming that ego is the only explanation for the full array of human behavior is just as hackneyed and over-simple (and naive and lazy?) as calling a corporation "evil," if you ask me. I hope you get what I'm saying.
I'm saying that dualism relies on the individual, and since individuals are vastly different so will the concept be. Thus the concept itself lack substance. Does this not make sense to you?
No problem there.
We all fight for ourselves, and there is nothing strange about an organism doing this. By denying this you deny your very own existance [sic] and the chain of events which brought you here, from single cell organism to the child of your parents. Don't be naive, and don't try to paint the world black and white with this nonsensical dualism.
Don't try to paint the world black and white with this nonsensical psychological egoism. It's a theory open to argument, and has seen criticism from multiple fronts for hundreds of years.
Also, there's no need to call your opponents lazy or naive--that's just rude.
I'm simply explaining the difference between fiction and reality.
This is a joke, right? Someone who hates dualism just said that?
Profanity is the one language all programmers know best.