Re:It's tough.... (Score 1)

"Since it seems he's used this camera analogy throughout the article I'll comment on this little blurb. I'm not so sure it's a very good analogy to use either. The fact is that if you want better pictures, you NEED to go through all of those "useless" features and change them. All of those values will change depending on the conditions, the lighting, and the activity your photographing. If there are those people that DONT care about those features, get the one-use ones. Hell, they even have digital one-time use camera now."

I think you are missing the point on this one. In his article, he recognizes that digital cameras have a slew of advanced features. The camera's features, however, do not get in the way of taking a picture. One with little to no knowledge of cameras or photography can pick one up and snap a picture without being inundated with advanced features.

Where exactly does quality enter the argument? He never refers to taking better pictures or a desire to become an expert photographer.