what I do know is IT workers, training their Indian and Asian replacements in the US WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING if unions where present. One of the biggest reasons its cheaper for companies to move to a new country has everything to do with willing Tech idiots training these people who will do their current job for LESS.
I don't think this stands up to scrutiny AT ALL. Globalization is the real issue here; in the current model it makes American labor very expensive compared to world prices. Unionized or not, there is a strong incentive for companies to send work offshore and move the means of production out of the USA. The endgame for this is obvious; a deflationary spiral as the "real economy" in the USA becomes a shadow of its former self. In my opinion, this is what is happening now. The USA is seeing what happens when you try to run a consumption based economy when you don't produce anything.
In summary, unions will not stop globalization. If anything, they will prevent their companies from making the changes needed to attain a cost structure comparable to their non-unionized competitors.
The $64 million dollar question is thus: How does unionization make American labor more competitive? Answer: it doesn't.
I don't understand, why are people concerned with this?
Well, presuming Oswald was not the killer, it means the killer(s) is still at large and probably responsible for other subsequent crimes. If you accept that the killer was an organization, it means it is especially likely it continues to commit crimes to this day. If one can get away with killing a US president, what sort of crime is out of reach?
My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the seashore.
