Nope 2024:

The relative sea level trend is 2.64 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 0.15 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1913 to 2024 which is equivalent to a change of 0.87 feet in 100 years.

Sorry I don't see the change in rate of increase before 1940 compared to after when CO2 really started rising quickly. If the last 75 years data has a curve it is very slight.

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=8724580

Ok say I take all of your points as valid, then I look back at the sea level rise over the last hundred years and if like you said we can't measure the second derivative then why are we worried? Looks like we have plenty of time.

You can see the slow rise better with the larger graph from that page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Holocene_sea_level_rise#/media/File:Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png
My point is that we are in a post glacial period with slow sea level rise. Now compare the linear sea level rise in the tide gauge data to the exponential CO2 level rise and from predictions we should see a curve upward in sea level and we don't. CO2 levels really took off during WWII and here 75 years later we are not seeing the exponential rise predicted.

Found a tide gauge in San Francisco with a longer history for further reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Holocene_sea_level_rise#/media/File:Post-Glacial_Sea_Level.png

Take a look at real sea level rise at https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=8724580
Now take a look at the historical sea level rise at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_sea_level and note the Post Glacial sea level rise, sea levels are rising but slowly and consistently over the last 2000 years.

Does sea level and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere correlate? Check out https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide and scroll down a little to the second chart and see the recent exponential rise in CO2 and compare the the flat sea level rise over the last hundred years. This is what convinced me that sea level rise is not correlated with CO2 levels.

My wife was honking the horn as she hit a lady who had for some reason decided to stop while crossing a highway to tend her grandchild, at night, in the rain. Compound fracture of the arm was the result. Out of work for three months. Never honk the horn.

More like they just weren't doing their job. Surfing for porn all day is not in the SEC charter.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/sec-pornography-employees-spent-hours-surfing-porn-sites/story?id=10452544

if that ever happens then we will all have to protect our DNA (Hair, skin, spit, etc.) because loss of control of your DNA to a criminal spells guilty in court.

I really worry more about the method of closure more than anything. Anybody ever seen the smoke coming off of a welding electrode? Can't be good for any media. First if you decide on any media such as DVD or CD then definitely use vacuum seal bags with some kind of internal frame/box to keep the vacuum on the bag from warping the media (if it needs to spin when read)

Otherwise make sure the welder understands that ~no~ gas from the welding process can enter the protected enclosure. Filling the enclosure with nitrogen (good) or helium (best) would be advisable.

Welded??? How the heck are the future pic viewers supposed to open the vessel??? What if they whip out the old cutting torch and slice it right through the middle with nice big lumps of slag dropping on your oh so carefully preserved media??

Think of a better way of enclosing such as a vacuum sealed box inside a sealed 30 gallon drum inside a sealed 55 gallon drum sealed in concrete.