Re:Usability is paramount (Score 1)

Yes. If you won't/don't use it, it's difficult to get anything out of it. Before dumping a lot of cash into something you're not 100% sure about, I might take a stepped approach. First, I'd start with some software (others have mentioned Google Earth/Sky -- which is a pretty cool use of Hubble's pictures) or books to learn the skies. Second, I'd might recommend a lower-budget scope (Edmund Astroscan, $300 4" sealed reflector; looks funky but works great) or binoculars that would provide good views to familiarize yourself with wide-angle views (beautiful). Only then would I make the jump to a scope w/ astrophoto capabilities. Dobsonian (big mirror) or refractor (smaller lens) would be the two choices -- I'd choose a 4" refractor (~$500) with a good mount, but that's because I love the planets and higher magnifications. Camera (CCD or film) is going to take a chunk of money. You might be able to save some $ by looking for a well-kept used manual Nikon or Canon model (camera shops usually sell used cameras). The point others have made is valid -- most who do astrophotography spend upwards of $10,000+ on equipment and such....so keep a reasonable set of expectations with your more limited budget.