I don't know what a current account with non-pharma drug provider is.
I so do, and I am surprised more didn't vote for this one. I voted at least 3x because it's so apropos. I need some donuts.
Ive felt this way for since Napster started. My music is the advertisement of my product. If you want to see me perform live, you'll have to pay. How are artists supposed to gain recognition if their product is not as accessible as possible, if most people will never hear it?
It's akin to asking someone to buy a car without driving it first knowing you will not be able to return it if you don't like it, because they assume once you take it home you're going to make an exact copy and dupe the dealer by returning it. We all know this is not what is happening. If we like the music, we will keep the album, not make an inferior version and return the original. This was never the issue. The RIAA just wants to protect their dying business model to no end, however unjustified their position is.
They should have just gotten on board with Napster to begin with and had a great distribution model from the get go. People loved it and now the RIAA realizes they can't win and should have done just that instead of making people hate them as much as the artists do.
Jamendo is a great recommendation, there needs to be more sites like that and maybe Flattr or Bitcoin could be integrated into one of those sites to facilitate payments.
How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hold the giraffe and one to fill the bathtub with brightly colored power tools.