Comment Re:Huh? What? (Score 2) 76
It was a big load of toss.
Comment KSP (Score 2) 140
Just killing some kerbals
Comment Re:Stupid interlligence (Score 1) 278
Wouldn't it take longer to be pulled over, explain that you are in the secret service. Wait for the officer to stop laughing, then PROVE that you are in the secret service, then get back on the road?
Solution: IdentiEeze
Comment Re:What am I missing? (Score 1) 431
Snowden has proved he has some pretty wicked shit. I'd say the governments are shitting themselves as the best is yet to come.
Comment Re:what about decryption keys (Score 1) 217
Google would have absolutely no idea what the data contains and absolutely no way to retrieve it either.
They could ensure the first n bits of the data are exactly the same (a header, meta data etc) making brute forcing so much easier.
Comment Re:Why use HTTP Compression? (Score 1) 106
mod parent up!
Comment Re:Why use HTTP Compression? (Score 1) 106
I know this. How is it related to compression?
Comment Re:Why use HTTP Compression? (Score 1) 106
Amdahl's law?
Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 505
Of course. That and milk.
Just the permeate, mind
Comment Re:focus (Score 4, Funny) 98
... we've got contacts like that already for "bifocal" use -- and dynamically black out
Peril Sensitive Contacts?