Comment Not Comparing Apples to Apples (Score 1) 75
BlueSky and Threads are not the same user base. Their users have different interests, are usually at different stages of life, and come from different backgrounds.
Simple examination of their own data shows this.
I am not sure what the businesspeople care about but it sounds like they've all bought into Elon Musk's Sauron-like "One App To Rule Them All."
When did folks start thinking it was an intelligent commentary to say that BlueSky doesn't have enough political naifs to qualify as a "place for politics online."
Like at minimum it's the place for *left-wing American* politics online.
Being the place for *both* left-wing and ultra-right-wing American politics would be *bizarre*. Like a combination US-USSR bar in 1973 would've been especially if people started performing legitimate concern that one group or the other had decamped to go drink with their friends instead of fight with their enemies.
It's just *bizarre*. Like a "politics" newsfeed that doesn't distinguish between what political views someone has, as if they're all equal to each other and worse, equally valid. That's *super common* on algorithm engagement-farming feeds because you really do want the combination US-USSR bar in 1973 because the guaranteed barfights bring you ad dollars.
We don't have to feed that kind of perversion, though.
Ask the commentators what they think social media sites are for if we leave "enriching investors" off of the list for just a smidgen of a second to consider things that aren't money for a moment. Like, say, let's consider "society" in our analysis of "social media." I know, "what sacrilege oh no the Great Investor in the Sky will be Big Mad" but it's Sunday so the Great Investor in the Sky is taking a nap right now. It's safe.