Comment Re:Pitiful defense so far! (Score 1) 954
See, for example, the 29 Apr 2007 entry on http://www.operatingthetan.com/, which links to an arrest warrant ordered by a retired judge with no connection (at that time) to Henson's case. There is a copy of the warrant at http://www.operatingthetan.com/extradition-from-ar izona-docs/first-warrant-enh.gif.
The warrant does not appear on the court docket, which can be viewed online (links at http://www.operatingthetan.com/).
The warrant, dated Sept 15 2000, claims Henson violated (among others), California Penal Code section 1320(A), failure to appear. The docket shows Henson appeared in Riverside County court before Judge Albert J. Wojcik on Sept 15 2000, and was released on his Own Recognizance.
Henson has claimed since several days PRIOR to the Sept 15 2000 hearing, that he was never properly noticed about it and only learned of it by accident. If he had not learned of the hearing, he would have been in another city attending a deposition ordered for another scientology-driven court matter, and he would indeed have failed to appear at the Riverside County hearing.
SEVEN MONTH LATER, the Riverside County prosecution maneuvered to bring Henson's case before the same retired judge that ordered the bogus warrant. The judge's conduct throughout this trial was unbelievable, but too long a story for a single post.
Henson only learned of this warrant a few weeks ago, when it was sent to Arizona authorities by the Riverside County authorities, who either didn't know its significance or never expected Henson to see it.
That's just one example. It's a particularly good one because the proof exists in corrupt Riverside County court's own records.
The warrant does not appear on the court docket, which can be viewed online (links at http://www.operatingthetan.com/).
The warrant, dated Sept 15 2000, claims Henson violated (among others), California Penal Code section 1320(A), failure to appear. The docket shows Henson appeared in Riverside County court before Judge Albert J. Wojcik on Sept 15 2000, and was released on his Own Recognizance.
Henson has claimed since several days PRIOR to the Sept 15 2000 hearing, that he was never properly noticed about it and only learned of it by accident. If he had not learned of the hearing, he would have been in another city attending a deposition ordered for another scientology-driven court matter, and he would indeed have failed to appear at the Riverside County hearing.
SEVEN MONTH LATER, the Riverside County prosecution maneuvered to bring Henson's case before the same retired judge that ordered the bogus warrant. The judge's conduct throughout this trial was unbelievable, but too long a story for a single post.
Henson only learned of this warrant a few weeks ago, when it was sent to Arizona authorities by the Riverside County authorities, who either didn't know its significance or never expected Henson to see it.
That's just one example. It's a particularly good one because the proof exists in corrupt Riverside County court's own records.
