Isn't "denser and more buoyant" a contradiction?

To be clear, this method of computation is not a method that is done by any natural biological system as far as I know. Their method of computation involves recombining how DNA single-strands hydrogen-bond to each other. Chemical reaction networks don't necessarily have to be done with DNA, but it's much easier to implement arbitrary networks with DNA than with other sorts of molecules since you can design how DNA sticks to other DNA. So there's really no correlation between how this code works and the "genetic code" which encodes for proteins and regulatory networks. Source: I worked for a few months with one of the authors of the paper.

One thing that bothers me about these quizzes is that two people that score moderate could have answered the exact opposite on all questions, yet have the same result. It seems like you lose a lot of information; why look at the quiz scores when you can just ask the actual questions?

Interesting. When did you go? There was none of the above when I went, barely even rumors.

I did three years of Duke TIP; The first year was really useful for getting me to open up socially. The second year I took a political philosophy class, and it lead me to really re-evaluate my beliefs and values. The third year, though, was the one that affected me most. I had a very exciting class on Nanotechnology (first term 2008) that really sparked an ambition in me. Now I'm about to publish my first math paper and attend Caltech. I wouldn't be where I am without having gone to TIP.

I can't see any way third parties will get any power without proportional representation or alternative voting methods like range voting or the single-transferable vote.