Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Find another provider (Score 3, Informative) 45

Is there a reason why you can't find another provider? Maybe there isn't one you can switch to in a month and a half, but big bang price increases with little notice doesn't bode well for your future with Rackspace.

Best,

Unfortunately, fewer and fewer hosting companies provide their own email services; over the past years most of them have migrated to 3rd party services like Microsoft's Exchange Online or Google's business email, both of which charge significantly more per mailbox.

When Godaddy did that a few years ago I looked at a lot of places, and the best option I came across was OpenSRS/Tucows, who has been around since 1999. they still only charged $0.50/month per mailbox or so. Only caveat is that they don't sell directly to end users, but provide services to 3rd party resellers. However, anyone can sign up for a reseller account.

Part of signing up as a reseller is paying $100, but that then gives you $100 credit for services in your account. At just $0.50/month per mailbox, that will last a long time. You do have the option to turn off your public reseller/online ordering portal and just use it for personal/friend/family.

Comment Re:No thank you. (Score 2) 56

Imagine driving off the lot with a new EV, and swapping your brand-new battery for some *used one*, from god-knows-where, when that battery is half the value of the entire vehicle. No, thanks.

This is the kind of thing that makes zero sense for regular consumers (for exactly the reason you mention), but it could be a great system for companies that operate a large number of cars internally, e.g. UPS/FedEx/USPS, or even car rental places, where a returning electric car can be ready for re-deployment in far less time than it would take to re-charge them the conventional way.
At least fleet cars would keep re-using their own batteries instead of receiving someone else's potential garbage.

Comment Re:A plant that burns nonexistent hydrogen. (Score 1) 76

Its chicken and egg. There won't be suppliers if there are no buyers.

It is not clear there will be suppliers even if there are buyers. Storing energy by making hydrogen is grossly inefficient.

Inefficient, but not necessarily a non-starter. Keep in mind that the more solar gets added to the electric network, there very well can be an excess of power at times. Excess power is starting to become a problem in the European grids these days. However, when there is more power than demand, you can divert that excess electricity to create hydrogen basically for free. The hydrogen can be stored and turned back into electricity later, e.g. at night when solar production is nil.

Comment Re:Saving consumers a whole 4.5 Euros (Score 1) 123

Or those fun old "universal" phone chargers, which had one wallbrick with 10 different molded cables for Sanyo, Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, etc. Which were all slightly different. And then when a friend visited and asked for a charger, they needed standard #11 which wasn't compatible with the 10 yours had.

And remember that the EU didn't mandate usb c: they told the tech industry to figure out some standards on their own or else... . It wasn't until AFTER the Samsungs, Amazon's, LGs and Sonys of the world all started standardizing their stuff with USB c and it hit critical mass that the EU mandated everyone else should follow that. It could just as easily been lightning cables if that was the direction the tech industry had decided to go.

Comment Re:Microsoft could avoid a lot of this.... (Score 1) 137

Which works great, until it doesn't. You risk that any future update can include cpu instructions which your system doesn't support, which could result in instability, crashes, or even being unable to boot. You're taking a /risk/ circumventing the cpu requirements. It may be an acceptable risk to you, but could come as a total surprise to the owner of a system who you helped upgrade on non-supported hardware.

Comment Re: (Score 1) 47

Won't help, since amazon mixes inventory. All "new" items with the same SKU end up in one bin. Any marketplace seller who claims to have new stuff and offers "fullfilled by amazon" will simply send their batch to Amazon, and it will be mixed right in with the rest of the legit stock. You have zero guarantees that Amazon's own sales came from the legit distribution channel instead of a marketplace sellers trunk who lied through their teeth to Amazon that it was new. /Same for straight-up ounterfit chargers and such mixed in with genuine Samsung, etc.

Comment Sure... (Score 1) 48

Amazon has admitted numerous times to their investors that they'd had a very hard time monetizing Alexa, which is running at a loss because the vast majority of users use them to control lights and music, but NEVER buy a single thing through it despite Amazon's more and more desperate attempts to shoehorn purchases in there.

Forcing ads down the throats of paying customers is not going to magically make them more likely to suddenly start buying things, it just means they'll start looking at alternative smart speakers that don't annoy them.

Comment Better than last time they did this. (Score 2) 22

At least this time there is a mechanism to transfer some of your purchased media to various participating 3rd parties and keep it, unlike last time.

When Microsoft gave up on and abandoned their oh-so ironically named "Plays4Sure" music DRM scheme in 2008 (4 years after launching it), the only options they offered were either: "Authorize your your playback license for each purchase before the shut-off date and that specific device will be able to continue to play it while it still functions and while you don't reset it, but it can't be transferred to another device or activated anywhere else anymore " or "You can remove the Plays4Sure digital protection by burning your purchased Plays4Sure music to CD and rip it back as MP3 by following these 17 easy steps. Better hurry and finish before , though!"

IIRC there was just a two-month (?) window between their initial announcement and the deactivating of the license servers altogether, if you missed that window all your music just became expensive digital dust.

Comment Re:Now remove the entire Microsoft Store (Score 1) 22

I hate anytime I am forced to use the Microsoft Store to download anything - usually Microsoft tools for the most part. They want to take their 15-30% from every transaction like Apple so badly. If they could get away with making it so you couldn't install anything from anywhere else like an iPhone I'm sure they would.

Microsoft already tried to do that a few years back, when most new PC's and laptops preloaded with Windows defaulted to "Windows 10 in S-Mode" -- which didn't let you install anything except things downloaded from the Microsoft Store. To disable that and revert back to "normal" mode and regain the ability to install regular 3rd party windows software, it required you to create a Microsoft account and sign in to the Windows store (which involves verifying your email address and phone) to download their "disable s-mode" app. Needless to say, that app was not offered outside of the store.

"Surprisingly", users didn't like it much.

Slashdot Top Deals

Disraeli was pretty close: actually, there are Lies, Damn lies, Statistics, Benchmarks, and Delivery dates.

Working...