Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The salseman is not the product (Score 1) 585

Hi, Thanks for the comment. I've heard that said before, that religion asks 'why' and science only asks 'what.' I'm not entirely sure I agree. Maybe that's what the relationship is supposed to be, but I'm not sure that's what it is. Without asking 'why', one discovery might not lead to another. 'Why' are these things attached to the kidneys (adrenals), 'why' is this little sack attached to the intestine (gall bladder). So, at least _some_ of the 'why' must occur, in order to get more of the 'what.' All things being equal, I can't imagine - statistically - that such complex and specific organs as eyes, ears, and a digestive system (with chemical sensors, multiple muscle types, villi(for extended surface area), folded gut(again, max surface area), acid production, mucosa to protect from the acid, etc.) could possibly occur all in the same organism. I think it's more statistically likely that the sun won't rise tomorrow. There is way too much order in the universe as a whole to support the long held belief of increasing entropy. I was taught that as FACT in college chemistry. It is not fact! Hydrocarbons, proteins, galaxies, solar systems, atoms, fatty acids, ant and bee colonies... way too much order for increasing entropy! I don't see entropy going on anywhere except mountains eroding. Please forgive me if I missed another good example of it, but there are too many examples against it. I should get a good flame war started with this one! I got kicked out of college once for a very similar discussion online! I wonder if slashdot will ban me ;)

Slashdot Top Deals

In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982

Working...