You can't prove anything in reality, and you can't understand anything completely in reality. Science can't be proven, but concepts can be true. He is a male, and she is a female, this is true.

The concept of a female and male are brought up, but do we truly understand what a female or male is? Is it simply the sexual organs that separate us? But do we know everything there is to be known about sexual organs? No, it is impossible to understand everything that there is to be known about anything in reality (or in a thread like this "reality").

Would you have to understand a atom completely, to completely understand cells?
Would you have to understand subatomic particles completely, to understand how the universe works?

Some would say it is ambiguous, but the nature of everything depends on the things that came before it, and what it is made of.

There are more questions to be thought of and not answered, then there are answers to be found to questions.

Science is metaphysical, because science can't tell you everything that there is to be known about anything. Science is like an abstraction of reality, we will only keep what has not been disproven and try to further our understanding until we disproof it again.

Nothing can be proven. Stop thinking you are smarter than other people. Start believing you are stupid, stop looking for answers, and ask more questions. There are way more questions to be thought of then there are answers to questions. Is that a loop? No, because a lot of questions cannot be answered. Humans are stupid when it comes to understanding reality, accept it.

who da fuck cares? like this is something that is revolutionary? this shit is pointless. there is nothing a a graphing calculator can do that a smart phone can be made to do. throw the fucking calculator in the garbage

NASA can suck a /.ers dick. Oh, I believe in NASA. They are soo great. you fucking morons don't realize how much they are holding from the public. you /. just get pounded in the ass for some NASA

YES. we are getting closer to playing battle bots on MARS

no. you cant determine the code quality until you look at the source code, unless you are talking with another programme

with satellites and telescopes able to see galaxies across the universe, and we get a shitty picture that looks like it was taken in 1960 u have to be an idiot to think these are qualified as detailed, today.

most people know smart phones are capable of receiving a virus, you don't have to be a geek to know this, they just might not realize how common it is. they are perceiving the threat more than what it is. The problem is how people use their phones today, its like an attachment to their arms. If private information isn't stored on the phone in the first place, there is no value in a virus except disruption of software.

first i would introduce the fundamental concepts behind programming without getting in to any coding. explain what variables, pointers, functions, are, etc When i first started programming in c & c++ in the 6th grade, I didn't have a teacher, just a crummy book and the internet. I had to figure it all out on my own, writing code wasn't the problem. the problem was understanding the concepts behind everything. It took me a while to understand pointers, and arrays because the information I was receiveing was telling me these were the hard concepts to learn, etc I would of probably dove deeper if it wasn't for being told that something was hard to understand. the problem with today is we treat children as if they are incapable of intellectual understanding. Conceptually yes they don't understand the world as we do, but we shouldn't hold them back. There have been children at the age of 4 or 5 who knew how to speak 3 or 4 different languages. There have been children who learned calculus before getting into highschool. All children are basically geniuses until they are told they are incapable of being so. but for the most part you should be a guidance for him, you can't force anyone to learn something they don't want to learn. If the kid is interested enough to learn he will learn, he just needs to be in the right environment. Anyway my opinion is that people should be learning social skills up to the age of 12, learning how to make friends, etc Today I've noticed social skills have been decreasing globally due to technology, he has the rest of his life to learn anything he wants. Let the kid be a kid for now, because I sure wished I kept being a kid before I started sitting at a desk, staring at the monitor, this is where he will eventually end up anyway.

I'd hate to break it to you bro but government has changed since November 19, 1863. capitalize FOR THE PEOPLE. LOL OBAMA PHONE

excuse me but, NASA is a private government corporation. they don't do anything for the public besides showing us some bullshit screenshots. How do we know how much information NASA is holding from the public? they are obviously allowed to do this. we shouldn't let NASA do the exploring for us, we need a public NON government corporation for the people, by the people. I want a website of a LIVE video camera that shows what these telescopes in orbit are showing these scientists looking in deep space, like the Hubble telescope. These observatories are completely capable of showing us by video LIVE everything they are looking at. Today If I want to explore space I have to buy a bullshit cheap telescope, google edited videos, documentaries, and screenshots. This isn't space exploration, and I shouldn't have to be a millionaire. so funk NASA.

this is starting to get ridiculous. DLC makes no sense on the computer, where you can make your own custom map, and mods. They had to remove this freedom from PC players for this to make any sense, why download 2 maps for that were from single player ported to multiplayer, when you can make your own for free? What is DLC on day one? This is simply content taken out of the game, made to DLC so the company can make more $$$