If you use a forwarding rule to forward emails sent to your hotmail address, then the sender is still the original address and the final recipient server will reject the email because it doesn't comply with the SPF rules on that original address (i.e. that SPF record doesn't include the hotmail servers).

You state it's an intermediary server in outlook that gives the error: that's correct, that server is talking to the expensify server which rejects the email, so the error is reported by the intermediate.

Since a short while I've noticed that Microsoft / Outlook is blocking emails where you don't have a correct SPF, DMARC and DKIM configuration going.
Also DKIM needs to be policy "block" or "quarantine", "none" doesn't cut it.

This should only affect sending domains that send (or have sent) more than 5000 emails in a day. We got hit by this after sending out a newsletter (yes, opt-in list).

This policy is apparently quite recent.

Most surveys here in the Netherlands always seem to start with "How likely are you to recommend $COMPANY to a friend?" on a scale of 1 to 10. This is such a stupid question that I hit ctrl-W immediately at that point. Please people, be a bit more creative with your questions. As cruff said earlier, not being able to choose "irrelevant" on some questions also means that the data is going to be worthless.

The fact that the legal version burdens you with these anti-piracy messages that aren't skippable doesn't help, when the pirated version is without any unwanted junk.

My Sony Xperia Z is 3 1/2 years old now. I recharge at night, and I have not noticed any degradation of the charge yet. and I usually have more than 50% left at the end of the day. So I don't see the problem.

I almost bought a webcam that could only be accessed via some cloud service provided by the manufacturer; it was *not* possible to access any streams locally. Useful for the clueless that just want to check up on the cat via the smart phone while doing some shopping, but not if you want to use it for security purposes... I.e. another gotcha to look out for when shopping for these things.

I upgraded the firmware on a Foscam camera and after rebooting the thing it refused to let me in because a plugin was missing. Thanks, Foscam... I'll never buy Foscam again. Plenty of others on the Foscam forum complaining about this, and Foscam only gives responses that indicate they're not going to change it.

I ported Vim to OS/2 when I had to work with that particular operating system.
I think that I was more productive on that job in total, even with the time spent on the port, than if I had not been able to use Vim.