Wouldn't the occasional gagger not kill you in your sleep?

In 13 years we'll be calling them the quaran-teens

nomoregoogle.com, which is mentioned in the article, has options for many Google services. I've been very happy with ProtonMail, though there are some inconveniences, like no full-content search with the web client (since that runs into decryption issues). Supposedly that's being worked on, though. Main thing I'm still looking for is a Calendar replacement, which doesn't appear on the nomoregoogle list.

Do not draw the attention of Shai Hulud

Sounds like they're asking for Libertarianism - small amounts of government to maximize the potential of people rather than to ensure maximum safety. We pay private companies for the roads (ISPs) ,we're responsible for our own protection or hire someone to protect us.

You may want to read the efail website with the description of the exploits. It *is* injection. Flaw one inserts HTML *around* the ciphertext. The second makes use of flaws in CBC to inject encrypted HTML into the message. While PGP can detect this, the email clients often ignore the warning and display anyway.

Bad guy intercepts encrypted email he wants to read. (MITM). He injects additional HTML data into the email (in his possession). He sends the email on to the original intended recipient. Recipient opens email. PGP or S/MIME plugin automatically decrypts the message and hands the output back to the email client for display. Mail client interprets the HTML, which happens to send the now-decrypted text to a webserver under the attacker's control.

So, yes, this does act as MITM. It does not require the attacker to have previously compromised the victim's system.

Yes. People *are* the problem. And in a situation with a kid with matches, the kid is the problem. It still makes sense not to give the kid matches in the first place. Not that we can prevent people from doing stupid things in a free society, I get that. But we can still hold the person who gives matches to the kid accountable, can't we?

Sufficient customer demand.

So, we demand that cable become unbundled so we don't have to get the channels we don't want, but when a mobile service offers what is essentially unbundling (cheaper access to just the sites you regularly use, still no restrictions on everything else) we complain we're getting screwed over.

It probably got blocked by the SPAM filters.

And yet some podcasts, such as Wooden Overcoats, have had success with their ads, so some people don't seem to mind them.

If I know the majority of my listeners skip the ads, I'll likely stop using ads and find another way to fund my project. Heck, the advertisers will want to see proof their ads are being listened to, otherwise they'll pull their ads. Granted, I don't use ads on my podcast, but knowing that my intro our outro music is being skipped tells me I shouldn't waste my (or my listener's) time with it.

Good thing Microsoft isn't an ISP or Americans would be freaking out.

And it's hardly "spying" when the guy holding the camera is standing out in the open with a Patriots sweatshirt. Filming, yes. Spying? That suggests secretive to me.