I guess my assumptions are tainted from running enterprise APs in my house and at my customers. Of course our hardware is awesome. :)

Thanks for sharing the baseline latency. I work for a rather prominent wireless manufacturer and I just don't see the latency you're talking about. Voice over wifi would be impossible with that level of latency and we see customers deploy that everyday. Is this limited to Linux?

The latency measurements in the article are meaningless. Reducing seconds of latency to milliseconds! Where is point a and b? The driver layer adds ten seconds of latency? None of this makes sense.

This really reads like an ad.

I understand the challenges but I maintain that it's not 240 million bucks worth of difficult.

How is building a website with a database back end a complex project? How does 240 million get spent and they couldn't afford a project manager? I know there are ridiculous integration requirement but this isn't exactly rocket surgery.

240 million dollars? For a website? This is amazingly stupid. That is a ridiculous amount of money for the functionality they're looking for.

Poor people problems. I'll get my mini giraffes online and not have to deal with that mob.

can't well do?

you know.... well.... I just don't know how to respond to this. You spend too much time on the internet formulating theories. Actually that should read, absorbing other people's theories. Yes, China is doing well right now. It probably is not from an overarching scheme to take over the world. Look at Japan in the eighties. They did well. Maybe China is doing well because they are making some right decisions. The are fucked up in many ways but they seem to be figuring stuff out economically. This is not a bad thing. Jingoistic shit like the tripe you are spewing just doesn't make any sense. Look at how dependent they are on our economy. You might want to look up, "THE FUCKING REAL WORLD AND HOW IT WORKS."

That is all I'm saying. I agree with you that it was not a fair trial. I'm talking about matters of severity.

FTA

(But Eka and the other judges concluded that simply endorsing the principles of copyright law was no grounds for disqualification in a trial; copyright was written into Swedish law, and judges can't be called "biased" simply because they support existing laws.
"The Court of Appeal has come to the conclusion that none of the circumstances set out, individually or taken together, means that there are legitimate doubts about the judge's impartiality in this case. There has not been any bias," concluded the court. The decision cannot be appealed")

Imagine the hideous analogies we can come up with. Judge A belongs to the bar association. Can he rule on lawyer misconduct? I am playing devil's advocate here and like I said I don't agree with the decision. I hope they win their appeal but I think human rights violation is a tad overboard. They still have their appeal.

They are going through the process right now. They are appealing. I'm not saying that I like the decision but this is far from Kafka.

Human rights violations? WTF. I think the judge is obviously biased and I disagree with the decision, but what human rights are being violated? What a bunch of self righteous pussies we are becoming. Read some history.

A little meddling certainly helped us in our revolutionary war. I tend to agree with you but it is not always so clear cut.