If these workers talking to the Guardian really exist (and the Guardian has a track record of making things up), they should probably start looking for work that suits them better.
Or better still, let them set up a company and run it using the practices they wish to force onto Amazon, and show us all how successful it would be.
In you analogy - it's their store. It's their property.
There is no principle that justifies that state controlling use of one's own property in such a way. That includes servers.
Because the EU believes every commercial activity should be controlled by the state - including publishing on the web.
This kind of overreach is why the EU is starting to fall apart.
>> "why are you wasting your time and talents in software development"
That's a statement of fact that's entirely invented by you. I moved on some time ago.
The key to happiness in the labour market is money.
If I'm selling my labour, getting the most money possible is the thing that makes me happy.
If the person buying my labour wants to give away the thing he pays me to produce, that's fine. But I want to get paid.
If the comic book industry is worth "saving", it will be able to save itself.
The state taking wealth by force and deciding how it should be distributed isn't "cooperation".
You'd think that after getting repeatedly crushed by electorates across the Western world, socialists would get the message that people aren't interested in being made dependents of the state.
Edge is Chromium now, isn't it?
Also, Vivaldi is Chromium?
And Opera? Chromium.
We've been Googled. All that browser/anti-trust stuff a couple of decades ago was a waste of energy.
The linked article is a long piece of denialism.
The piece Bode is refuting says EU networks are "strained and suffering from a lack of investment and innovation".
Bode pretends it says, instead, that "European networks have fallen apart". Arguing against something the other person never said is normally a sign that one is on shaky ground.
Net "neutrality" is an ideological goal, not a practical one. Its supporters just can't get over the fact that the internet works great without it, just as it always has.
Oddly enough, that claim is indistinguishable from something you just made up on the spot.
But their slave labour is so temptingly cheap...
It's not the same here. Western companies don't jump when the state tells them.
The people did indeed vote the Tories, and have been doing so for the last decade.
The DPA was perfectly adequate. It did what we need, and avoided the overreach and unforeseen side-effects of GDPR.
Having a legislature able to make laws isn't a "disaster". The alternative is a non-democratic state, of the kind we in the UK keep rejecting.
Democracy isn't "volatile". Your language betrays your fear of other people.
Nobody is arguing the WHO was "doing nothing".
The problem is they were actively helping Communist China by denying the presence and then the scale of the problem.
"Just think of a computer as hardware you can program." -- Nigel de la Tierre
