Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Is this correct or lost in translation? (Score 0) 330

Cool. I find it interesting that there seems to a certain amount of opposition to this then; surely making it more difficult to access child pornography is a good thing?

See, this is exactly why there is so little opposition to this: People only see that part of the argument and don't get the implications (can't say I blame you though).

What makes this so outrageous is that this filtering is done directly by the BKA (basically the German FBI), without any other instance (uhm, some judge perhaps?) reviewing them. Up until now we used to have this thing called "separation of power", but it seems that this is way too crazy a concept to base a government on.

Also, the list is secret. Good call. Otherwise people might see how these lists pretty much always contain false positives (Finnland and Australia come to mind).

All these things are rather abstract, especially for the average Joe. Which makes this all the more dangerous.

Comment Re:So what? (Score 0, Troll) 665

Eventually people will learn to ignore that liar.

How? As long as there is no banner on the Scientology page (in WP, I mean) explaining this, then how are people to know? Most folks don't really do background checks on most things, now do they?

I for one thank wikipedia to use their stance and point out that this shit is not tolerable. Next up, christianity, islam, judaism. Way to go wiki.

Good going. Let's sqash those damn religions! What good have they ever done for us? Let's ban them all, so free speech is guaranteed for everyone who deserves it.

Slashdot Top Deals

Pound for pound, the amoeba is the most vicious animal on earth.

Working...