That kinda has been the thinking of every military planner going on the offensive, WW1, WW2, Korea war, Afghan wars,etc but reality has often complicated things leading to prolonged conflicts.
Now sure, the complex supply chains needed to build an advanced air-force might be destroyed quickly but short of an invasion (That will lead to tricky insurgency fighting) an attacked major country will probably have enough resources left to start producing AA weapons (not counting that there is probably far more advanced AA weapons in existence than there is aircraft for any power) causing an attacking air-force to be worn down over time (think of the Battle of Britain).
The Iraqi war was the first chapter of modern air superiority but the subsequent Serbian conflict showed that even if being initially suppressed, the Serbians did show that a technologically inferior party will find ways to shoot down aircraft (That are expensive to replace) and with the land mass of the US or Russia (partly China) then those parties will find ways to make attacks far into the center of their territory tricky, short of using Nuclear weapons, leaving an area where they could restart production of weapons.