THe MS ruling may not mean much after all (Score 1)

THis judge has been over-ruled several times on previous MS decisions he has made, especially regarding some of the fof about IE. The appeals court has previously ruled that Judge Jackson is in no postion to make a technical determination of internet explorer for example paragraph 173 that ie has a negative effect on consumers. That is only one example of some of the questionable findings from a legal point of view that judge jackson made. He is right about some things - MS does things that are restrictive and anticompetive and the court should require that MS change some of its practice. I wish I had the time and space to to go through the fof line by but i don't. Just don't be surprised if the appeals court overrules judge jackson and restricts the type of damages he can order plus changes the fof despite what the /. legal expert says. This trial is not over by any means and the only way to tell who truly won is to wait a few years and then make a determination. Ed Bailey