Compared to McDonald's? Absolutely, although let's also be honest, that's not a high bar to get over.

Care to explain how this makes any sense at all? 'Cause right now all I see is the potential for massive security and real-world safety vulnerabilities.

Google has gone completely bat-shit insane. How on earth did they think this was a good idea, let alone actually go forward and implement such a thing in the release product?

Just mind-boggling.

I think gp's point was that he wants to control the pendulum, not hurl it the other direction.

Don't be so cynical. It's both.

I like this. It's the most sensible option I've read yet.

No one should be deprived of a 'whoosh' in 2016.

It comes in bottles now?!

This will only matter once robots/AI are very nearly sapient, which is several decades away at least. Doing something like this now is severely jumping the gun and may very well have a negative impact on short-term r/AI development and advancement.

Let's wait and get a clearer picture of where the technology is going before trying to legally quantify and tax it, eh?

Maybe I'm just old and senile, but didn't 3.11, ie. "Windows for Workgroups", include one?

This was NOT necessary.

Your post has been improperly moderated. It should be (Score:5, Awesome).

Oooo, stealthy AND fast.

So, nuke Japan to save them from the Soviets?

I gotta admit, that's a twist I hadn't heard before.