Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Her Salary Skyrocketed While Firefox Tanked (Score 4, Informative) 57

She was raked over the coals recently for her salary, specifically how rapidly it increased while Firefox was losing market share:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

> In 2018 she received a total of $2,458,350 in compensation from Mozilla, which represents a 400% payrise since 2008.[17] On the same period, Firefox marketshare was down 85%. When asked about her salary she stated "I learned that my pay was about an 80% discount to market. Meaning that competitive roles elsewhere were paying about 5 times as much. That's too big a discount to ask people and their families to commit to."[citation needed]

> In 2020, after returning to the position of CEO, her salary had risen to over $3 million (in 2021, her salary rose again to over $5 million,[18] and again to nearly $7 million in 2022[19]). In August of the same year the Mozilla Corporation laid off approximately 250 employees due to shrinking revenues, after previously laying off roughly 70 in January (prior to the pandemic). Baker blamed this on the COVID-19 pandemic, despite revenue rising to record highs in 2019, and market share shrinking.[20]

Comment Re:Can't use Twitter as an example (Score 5, Insightful) 101

I'm very pro-vax. I was double boosted & got the 2023 booster the day after it was available.

However, I really hate this false dichotomy that vaccines are either poison or they're perfect. Both sides are wrong. They're medicine. Medicine almost always comes with tradeoffs.

We need to stop painting questions about side effects, and things like the benefits for demographics as "anti-vaxx".

Let's stick with science. Science welcomes questions. That's how we learn.

Comment Publishers wanted to charge Big Tech (Score 5, Insightful) 101

The Publishers misplayed their hand. They wanted Big Tech to start to pay them just for indexing & showing links to their content.

If Big Tech Wants News, Shouldn’t They Pay for It?
https://www.yesmagazine.org/de...

California Bill Would Make Big Tech Pay Publishers for News
https://www.govtech.com/policy...

Google agrees to pay French publishers for news
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/21...

Canada Introduces Bill Requiring Online Giants to Share Revenues With Publishers
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/0...

So, of course, the obvious answer is stop linking to those sites.

The publishers aren't stupid, so I imagine they knew the value they were getting from all the traffic being driven to their site. I imagine they thought they could have their cake & eat too -- both the traffic & the fees.

Comment Correction (Score 4, Informative) 256

> President Joe Biden sought to assure customers of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank on Monday that their money was safe -- insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund

There's a fundamental misunderstanding here on what happened with SVB.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Fund insures up to $250k. There was never a question on if that money was safe. Everyone knew it was the entire time.

The question was what would to accounts & funds over $250k? Those *aren't* insured by the FDIC. A lot of companies had balances far in excess of $250k to pay bills & make payroll. Would *those* uninsured funds be protected?

The news on Friday was the FDIC said, yes, it would make sure those funds are covered too. (They also made clear it won't be covered via taxpayer dollars, but that's a different topic.)

What Biden is trying to make clear is that:

- If you were a bank *customer*, your money -- insured or not -- is fine
- If you were a bank *investor*, you lost your money

Comment Re:Are there any left? (Score 1) 60

Amazon has a big benefit: they're profitable.

That's a weird statement to make here. With the exception of Twitter, all of these companies are profitable. Massively so.

Apple had 20.72B in profit. Google had 13.91B in profit.

Even Meta made a 4.39B in profit. Grant a lot more modest, but it's even greater than Amazon's 2.87B.

Comment Re:Surprised he even bothers (Score 1) 637

I didn't see the rest of the comment as relevant since he was talking about Biden and himself there. The only portion I was concerned about was him complimenting Putin. I skimmed through the rest of the interview but didn't see anything else that was on the topic or provided a disclaimer to the topic, but figured by linking to the original source rather that other people's opinions was the most informative path.

Comment Re:Surprised he even bothers (Score 0) 637

So are you saying that Trump is stupid?

https://www.clayandbuck.com/pr...

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, what went wrong was a rigged election and what went wrong is a candidate that shouldn’t be there and a man that has no concept of what he’s doing. I went in yesterday and there was a television screen, and I said, “This is genius.” Putin declares a big portion of the Ukraine — of Ukraine. Putin declares it as independent. Oh, that’s wonderful.

So, Putin is now saying, “It’s independent,” a large section of Ukraine. I said, “How smart is that?” And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. That’s strongest peace force We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace all right. No, but think of it. Here’s a guy who’s very savvy I know him very well. Very, very well.

Slashdot Top Deals

It's great to be smart 'cause then you know stuff.

Working...