now this is a different kind of justice... (Score 1)

What happened to innocent until proven guilty? The court can assume that she is guilty because she wiped her hard drive, now? Isn't it the job of the _prosecution_ to try to obtain the evidence for a case (eg, siezing the HD with a subpoena), NOT the defendants? Why was the drive even still in her posession. I think she should be held in contempt, but not declared guilty by default.