WordPerfect 5.1 and 5.2

There, I said it. It had too many keyboard shortcuts, but at least it did what I needed.

Same with Lotus 123.

This explains why BMW drivers don't indicate when changing lanes or turning: they haven't paid their subscription fee for the indicators.

Have they tried turning it off and on again?

Perhaps they are using AI and the underlying infrastructure wrong, then.

Are they holding it correctly?

They build resort style living on the moon to fund the project that ends up causing the moon to fracture altering the gravitational influence resulting is earthquakes and the human population diverging into two distinct species one that lives above and one that lives below.

The Eloi and Morlocks if memory serves me correctly.

No, for every person who does leave, there is at least one who signs up.

So unless that person who leaves telegraphs that they are leaving in a meaningful way that it gains traction that those considering onboarding reconsider, there will always be a revolving door of new users to replace the disgruntled ones.

Another aspect to consider, those threatening to leave, may even adjust their usage patterns of the platform that negates or weakens the impact of the new features.

They are adding the horns and pitch fork.

Someone at Microsoft must have asked Copilot to do their work for them, failed to proof it, and then pushed it to production.

but will ET be able to phone home?

Precisely, a hammer will always strike, but you have to trust the operator of the hammer that their positioning will land the blow on the nail and not on the thumb.

Yes, but was it observed?

It works when the LSP is too slow or does not load properly, but there is no way I will trust copilot to fill out a code block for me.

The irony, I suppose that is the correct word - might be coincidence, its suggestions that it uses are my own code so I guess I should feel flattered in those instances.

There are no ads, no malware links, and no junkware store recommendations pushing cheap knock offs.

That is not to difficult at all, someone has to plow the field to be able to say "Would you like fries to go with that?"

This is an example of confirmation bias. I would not be surprised if the researchers also have published studies demonstrating survivor bias.

Given the increase, both publicised and otherwise, of nuisance calls over the last 40 years, it is hardly a statistical anomaly that there are more users opting to not answer an unknown or unrecognised phone number.

Given that this become generational with parents advising children to ignore unknown numbers, text messages etc it is bound to become engrained eventually as a normal practice.

The same has become true for emails. If an email comes from domain or business that is not recognised then chances are it will be ignored, or deleted regardless of the content.

Are these real subscriptions, or are they subscriptions bundled with other packages, services or forgotten trails periods?