Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yes it is. (Score 0) 154

Still holds up if you change "companies" to "government".

The answer is yes.

The bug is that you have an education where help is needed from outside. The feature is that programs like these can be used as a tax deduction and/or a way to influence.

Having companies have influence in schools is something that is bad, as far as I can see it. When I was young, representatives of TetraPack came to the schools to explain to the kids how their package was better than bottles. Yep, throweing was away better than keeping it.

I was too young to doubt adults, so I believed them. No doubt that many other kids did the same. The goal was that the kids would talk at home how they learned about this great new way of throwing away things was better than old fashioned glass. (Better for the enviroment as well, somehow)

So kids where used directly to influence.

I do not trust companies about the information they give me as an adult. They have been lyinh and cheating enough for me not to trust them. So I certainly not trust them in educating these small humans.

Having government have influence in schools is something that is bad, as far as I can see it. When I was young, representatives of government came to the schools to explain to the kids how the drug war was good for people. Yep, imprisoning drug users was better than allow people to use drugs.

I was too young to doubt adults, so I believed them. No doubt that many other kids did the same. The goal was that the kids would talk at home how they learned about this great new way of performing cavity searches in airports to check for drugs was better than old fashioned allowing people to do what they want. (Better for the enviroment as well, somehow)

So kids where used directly to influence.

I do not trust government about the information they give me as an adult. They have been lyinh and cheating enough for me not to trust them. So I certainly not trust them in educating these small humans.

Comment Re:Well (Score 0) 154

It's simple: people just don't like the rich, so nothing they do with their money will make people happy. About the only thing people want to see is the rich being forced, by government, to have their wealth confiscated.

Anything else is seen as "vain" or "futile" or "just an attempt to deflect attention" from something.

Submission + - SPAM: Transport employees were secretly paid by the DEA to search travelers bags

schwit1 writes: THERE are many reasons why you might have been stopped at an American transport hub and your bag searched by officials. You might have be chosen at random. Perhaps you matched a profile. Or you could have been flagged by an airline, railroad or security employee who was being secretly paid by the government as a confidential informant to uncover evidence of drug smuggling.

A committee of Congress heard remarkable testimony last week about a long-running programme by the Drug Enforcement Administration. For years, officials from the Department of Justice testified, the DEA has paid millions of dollars to a variety of confidential sources to provide tips on travellers who may be transporting drugs or large sums of money. Those sources include staff at airlines, Amtrak, parcel services and even the Transportation Safety Administration.

The testimony follows a report by the Justice Department that uncovered the DEA programme and detailed its many potential violations. According to that report, airline employees and other informers had an incentive to search more travellers' bags, since they received payment whenever their actions resulted in DEA seizures of cash or contraband. The best-compensated of these appears to have been a parcel company employee who received more than $1m from the DEA over five years. One airline worker, meanwhile, received $617,676 from 2012 to 2015 for tips that led to confiscations. But the DEA itself profited much more from the programme. That well-paid informant got only about 12% of the amount the agency seized as a result of the his tips.

Link to Original Source

Comment As someone who tests phone apps for a living... (Score 1) 95

I am not surprised in the slightest that apps crash more frequently on iOS than Android devices. It is an order of magnitude more difficult to automate app testing on iOS than Android. You cannot emulate an iOS device like you can an Android device (no, the Simulator doesn't count - if it requires a special build, it doesn't count), and Apple's OS updates frequently break test automation. You also cannot simply programmatically control actions and read screen state on iOS without extra signing steps in iOS 10, which is why most third-party testing services don't offer iOS 10 devices in their testing labs.

Developers and testers simply test iOS less (even though they almost certainly spend more time on it).

Comment Re:You can't (Score 1) 237

Simply put, there is no such thing as a truly secure phonecall.

Any "easy" solution coming out of or running through the USA needs to be "insecure" thanks to CALEA - Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act - but even if this were not an issue, the endpoints can still be bugged and systems hacked.

You may be able to get a fair part of the way there by setting up your own infrastructure (ie something which runs over a VPN and/or ZRTP) - Maybe look at Silent Circle for an ?easy? partial solution to your woes.

Truth. The thing most people forget is that the NSA and similar organizations use brute-force decryption as a last resort. As the FBI has demonstrated very publicly several times over the last year that hacking the endpoint is the preferred method of intercept (after CALEA) because it's so much easier.

Windows Phone, iOS, and Android (yes, including Black Phone) all have so much surface area and so many insecure third-party dependencies that it's all but impossible to lock them down. So if someone really wants in, you're going to get hacked no matter which phone or app you're using.

Comment Re:As a C programmer (Score 1) 315

Hell no. :-) C is by far the most portable language. Really, my main point was just a warning that there aren't many libraries that were written with absolute, architecture-independent portability in mind, and the key take-away from that should be: add third-party dependencies very cautiously, and test the shit out of your code.

Slashdot Top Deals

One has to look out for engineers -- they begin with sewing machines and end up with the atomic bomb. -- Marcel Pagnol

Working...