Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:But that is now (Score 1) 430

When laptops plummet in price, so do margins on laptops.

I feel there's still money to be made in the high-end market, and I do not feel laptops will ever match desktops in performance/$. If you have two components of the same architecture, same performance, the one that is larger in size is probably cheaper to produce.

Also, passengers cars will never catch will people move around their pianos?

Taking your car analogy further, trucks and larger vehicles are still being sold today; they are still useful. There are still pianos that need to be moved.

So I am puzzled when you say:

Sane people have realized desktop computers were going away for quite some time

Some use cases/applications that I can think of that would benefit from the higher performance of a desktop:

1. PC gaming market is still going to be around
2. Growth of 3D media, I certainly see a need for higher performance computing here
3. Media creation/editing (3D modeling, video editing, etc.)

What's more, in the future much of the "power" in our computers will come from the Internet. You probably won't even need to store or edit your music, movies, and other files locally for long—we're getting better wireless network drives and Internet-based storage systems, and soon all your media will reside in a central location (in your house or some far-off server farm) accessible to all your machines.

Given that people will have remotely-accessible storage residing in the home for their portable devices, I could also imagine people running a more powerful personal server machine in their homes.

Perhaps your mobile applications can offload expensive calculations to your home server, who knows? Bringing the data center to the home, in a way.

And so I feel that's another area where there's a need for more powerful stationary computing.

The article references a Forrester Research report, and the article really missed an important point in the original report:

Desktops aren’t dead. Fewer desktops will be sold in 2015 than in 2010, but in 2015, they’ll still be used by more consumers than any other type of PC.

Comment Re:Sham (Score 1) 120

Well, when I search for restaurant reviews on Google, I often see Yelp near or at the top of the results.

With online reviews, I would agree with you if the establishment in question has only a handful of reviews.

On the other hand, if I see a place with 150+ positive online reviews, it's likely that place has good food.

Yes, there are shills, unreasonable customers, people with poor taste, not every good restaurant will be reviewed, some duds will get good reviews, etc., but it's better than having no information at all.

Comment Re:Sweet spot (Score 1) 1027

Technically, you could implement such intricate server-side dependencies, but I'm not convinced that makes business sense.

Developing this code will be more costly because you've now made your single player, locally run game a networked game. You will have increased support costs as customers complain about their game not working because of some network failure. Your game is now vulnerable to denial of service attacks. You now have to maintain servers for your game, which incurs maintenance. hardware, bandwidth, electricity costs. You will get bad press, and drive away some % of your paying customers.

You will potentially get some % of the pirates to buy your game. Is this worth it?

I think the author's idea that this is an experiment has merit, I do remember when Ubisoft released a Prince of Persia game without DRM to see how it sell.:

"But this will make everyone hate them.

Perhaps. Make no mistake. Ubisoft will lose customers and earn much nerdrage over this. But they are engaged in a grand experiment. They are seeing if an adequately pirate-proof game can make money. Will keeping cracked copies off the Torrents for a month make extra sales? And enough extra sales to make writing PC games worthwhile? Because the current system, where 90% of the copies out there are pirated and only megahits that could turn a profit on that 10%, doesn't seem to be working."

That said, I think he overestimates the difficulty of cracking this specific implementation.

Comment Re:Point taken, but not "undoable" (just BIG effor (Score 1) 145

1. that would be an absolute nightmare in terms of code maintainability, debugging, etc. Windows source code today is far larger than Windows 3.0 code

2. compilers have improved since the Windows 3.0 days, they're far better than humans at optimizing in many cases

3. Itanium architecture is explicitly parallel, writing assembly for that is completely different from writing x86, it's far from a simple conversion

4. Game performance is limited mostly by your GPU, and CPU usage by your OS is minimal compared to CPU usage by the game itself. Gamers won't see much benefit from this.

The effort required to write and maintain the code in assembly is so great that it's infeasible in practice, and you wouldn't really get that much benefit from doing it.


Parallel Processing For Cardiac Simulations Using an Xbox 360 101

Foot-in-Mouth writes "Physorg has an article about a researcher, Dr. Simon Scarle at the University of Warwick's WMG Digital Laboratory, who needed to model some cardiological processes. Conventionally, he would requisition time on a university parallel-processing computer or use a network of PCs. However, Dr. Scarle's work history included gaming industry experience as a software engineer at a company associated with Microsoft Games Studio. His idea was that researchers could use Xbox 360s as an inexpensive parallel computing platform due to the console's hefty parallel processing-enabled GPU. He said, 'Although major reworking of any previous code framework is required, the Xbox 360 is a very easy platform to develop for and this cost can easily be outweighed by the benefits in gained computational power and speed, as well as the relative ease of visualization of the system.'"

YouTube Passes Yahoo As #2 Search Engine 125

Dekortage writes "According to the latest ComScore rankings, YouTube's search traffic for August surpassed Yahoo's. The latter dropped roughly 5% in traffic from July. Among other things, this means that Google now owns both of the top two search engines. AdAge further speculates on Google's experimental 'promoted videos' cost-per-click advertising on YouTube, suggesting the obvious: more money."

Slashdot Top Deals

CCI Power 6/40: one board, a megabyte of cache, and an attitude...