Re:performance (Score 0)

I simply don't know why people (mainly Mac users) want to compare GHz vs GHz. Either you're stupid or you've been living in a cage since AMD put out Athlon XP's. Hz doesn't matter today as much as it did a couple of years back. So what if your 2.5 GHz G5 is faster then my Athlon 2600 (it's not actually) if I have to pay $500 for AMD and $1500 for the Mac. It's the same with graphics cards. Why compare a 128 MB card with a 128 MB card if the latter costs more. Note to idiots: We don't care about the specs on the paper. We care about the price vs performance ratio. Funny enough, this reminds me of the Mac Mini.