This is how Windows got spread in the first place. What were they doing 25 years ago?

I can vouch for you, +1.

Unless the government enforces its usage by law for people.

I can already see it. A cheap rip of C language, symbols replaced with Chinese characters, and the language is called ming, coming with a book that is a complete rip off the white book.

A Chinese-quality, rigged OS with backdoors

Yeah, let's pretend that 80+% of the world isn't using Android, not to mention supercomputers or huge server deployments. What you're missing is not everyone is using an IBM compatible PC and play games whole day in their mom's basement.

"Update to to icc", that I would understand (for Intel platforms). "Upgrade to LLVM" sounds like this is not coming from a C++ programmer who really cares about the final binary (yes, GCC still produces better binaries is most situations). And given the issue at hand, it seems you're under the delusion that LLVM is bug-free and doesn't miscompile stuff. Yes, LLVM gives prettier error messages. Yes, LLVM code-base is module. Yes, Apple fan boys love it. Yes, it's BSD licensed and plays along nice with people who don't really care about software freedom. Nothing I care about here. But, LLVM codebase is as bug-ridden as GCC or any other codebase, don't pretend otherwise.

Is it already April Fools'?

Also, there are many things in the world that are not quantized as far as the world we know. Position, angle, time and many others are not quantized.

Quantization is not digitalization. Quick example #1: there are 2 spin states for spin-1/2 particle (this is quantization); the state of the particle is a complex 2-dimensional which can have any value as long as it is a unit vector. You cannot represent it error-free using a digital system with finite precision. Quick example #2: energy levels of hydrogen atom are quantized. Still you cannot represent them perfect on a digital system without introducing errors due to finite precision.

Lol. You don't get famous, nor near a far vicinity of being rich by publishing some papers in Nature/etc.

People still use Windows?

Fancy words you have there. Keep telling yourself "enlightenment" was thanks to PhDs and valuable papers in philosophy and other departments, not science and miserable people.

Sorry to bust your bubble, but then can't do MITM on any decent Linux distro. The package in repositories are signed.

Given his ignorant manner, I think he's talking about Windows.