Framing, lightning, composition are just what the prompts are all about.

You're more than happy to get our power for a fraction of what we should be really paying. Germany green energy is largely subsidized by France. And we're REALLY NOT HAPPY that our consumers are paying 4x the Price juste ton prevent the collapse of Germany industry. So at least stop complaining.

We French are fed up to pay for german idiocies. They're poisoning everyone with their coal. They're constantly begging for French electricity so that their industry does not fall off. They're dismissing their wind turbines so that they can enlarge their coal facilities. ENOUGH !

A monkey typing at random on typewriter will write Shakespeare's complete works in an long period of time. A monkey playing at random on a saxophone will produce jazz at the first take. Do we need more/different jazz ? Of course we don't! Some years ago musicologists complain that musical habits of people where fixed in their very young years and they tend to listen to only music of their generation. Now one are complaining this is the opposite. I see no problem with people listening "old" music that has been curated for decades if not centuries. Is there a risk for new music?. I don't think so. There's a risk for bad music (90% of music of any era). It will be forgotten. The rest will become a classic.

Stopping facebook ? Or stopping those NGO funded by Soros ? Is facebook or Soros the more of a threat for democracy ? Can't tell.

Can I make a few bucks ?

The point that beloved extensions are gone is still relevant.

the second coming of the "IE Only". Yeah I fear that. I call it "FF devs don't give a damn". Lots of things in web worker seem to be stalled because of Firefox limitations (document parser, offscreen canvas) and FF dev don't care (or rather "this will be too much work"). Watch out, there will be a time when applying FF workarounds will be too much time too.

No. He's saying advantages of his current browser over FF are enough not to bother with FF and his alleged speed and memory footprint

You don't get it (or pretend not to). Firefox push(ed) propaganda on my welcome page (through snippets (that could be disabled in FF Settings/Homepage/...)) Chrome does not. It only lists my preferred sites or last sites I visited. There could be some politics in Google.com (through the doodles) but Google.com is NOT my browser. Chrome IS.

Mozilla is throwing millions at collecting opinions/feelings of non tech savvy users who don't give a damn about UI. Then a clique of UX dev decide what is good for everyone (and apply a 1.25 scale factor because mobile and nonthreatening colors because inclusion) When power users say the new choice is idiotic for x reasons and not supported b numbers then the UX dev team ignore them and start menacing closing the bug report. And it needs tenth of opponents to the new choice before they step down. How (in)sane is that ?

So true! Please anybody vote the parent comment coz I don't have any mod points.

Chrome (or chromium) Tons of extensions. Not pushing their politics in my throat in my homescreen like Firefox. If there were UI changes; they didn't bother me as much as those from FF. Better debugging tools. ... Down sides is privacy. But I'll happily trade my privacy (or rather I'll enforce it using external tools) against FF propaganda.

Any proof that Mozilla use A/B testing on large scale (and not just two of them at Mozilla (in)usability division) ? Everytime they loose x percent of their user base because the removed feature made FF different from other browsers.

Sh*tty implementations are not the problem of users. What they see is that their beloved extensions are gone.