shocked, I tell you, that someone who is beyond balls deep in the mix of technology and marketing woo woo that his company (amongst others) has sprayed utterly ridiculous quantities of cash on, and who needs to generate revenue to satisfy shareholders' desire for RoI, is making all these promises of epoch changing experiences for end users.
What we get instead is parlour game legerdemain, weirdly unsettling reheated word salad (and that's when it's not clearly utter bullshit), Disneyfied colour saturated images, dominated by the bias and prejudices of a small, and not particularly representative group of human beings. If it weren't so enraging it would almost be funny. Especially the bit about search, because let's be honest here, pretty much all of the major products are useless for search, seeing as they just make shit up. It's basically a feature that you cannot trust the output.
Mass market machine-generated slop is an abomination. There are perfectly good, targeted, and useful applications of machine learning with tightly controlled training data, but who wants to drink from the well on offer now? It's more like a firehose laced with sewage; the only things you end up with are the stench, and the information equivalent of typhoid, polluting everything it touches.
... has ceased to be. It has expired and gone to meet its maker. It has shuffled off its mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. It is an X parrot.
I bet X.org are giving Elon the side eye right now, and Apple must be laughing their vintage 20 year old MacOS Panther and Tiger labelled socks off.
"But Elon's a business genus."
"if his tweets cross a line with abusive behavior."
What, you mean apart from threatening another nation with a nuclear attack, or the numerous instances of boorish, abusive and just generally shitty behaviour? What do they count as "abusive behaviour", when it's clear he's not only crossed that line, but pole vaulted it while wearing a jetpack.
There's an often used word for this in Cockney rhyming slang: cobblers.
"...the negative costs of their technology, such as end-to-end encryption"
Negative. Costs.
Well, that's a fairly subjective view of the situation, isn't it it, old chap? I think there are a great many people who would like to see your working on that one, before giving you a smash in the face with a frying pan for being an utter twatknacker.
Not just that, she was in Doctor Who as well...
Up to a third of Americans believe the earth is around 6000 years old, and that evolution is a lie. And increasing numbers believe the earth is flat, in spite of fairly compendious evidence to the contrary.
So you'll forgive me if the opinions of the American public don't exactly fit me with a sense of confidence or hope in their sense of judgement when presented with inconvenient things like facts.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. -- John Kenneth Galbraith