Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Still qualifies (Score 3, Insightful) 221

I agree with this. The problem is, even if the marketers are not claiming this is "strong AI", they are not making any real distinction. And because the general population doesn't understand that there is one and tends to think of AI as synthetic intelligence, they will likely continue to try to interact with AI as if it were a synthetic human, expecting it should behave like some kind of more perfect version of themselves. And this all while the companies producing it control the data and profit from their delusion. For anyone who thinks "Big Tech" already has too much power / control over user data, if Gates' predictions hold true, it's going to get much worse before it gets better.

Comment I can't imagine (Score 3, Insightful) 31

...this will get any serious traction. Why would anyone want to entrust all their browsing habits to Amazon? What would make them switch from whatever they're used to using now? The only thing I would consider using it for (or recommending anyone use it for) would be as a standalone Amazon app on the desktop. Then I could remove my Amazon container in Firefox and keep Amazon further siloed from the rest of my browsing.

Also, will this browser be based on Chromium, too?

Comment Re:Wow... (Score 1) 75

I don't think those two scenarios are comparable. I mean for one thing, as demonstrated on Jan 6, to do it right you gotta rally together an angry mob, whip them into a frenzy, point them in the right direction, and be willing to let some people die. I'm sure Epstein Island security would've been an interesting scene if it was done that way.

Comment Wow... (Score 1) 75

Just wow. Ya know, it's stuff like this that really pokes holes in so much of the conspiracy stuff. If an agency this high profile and important doesn't have redundant protocols in place to properly secure a friggin Zoom meeting, how the hell does anyone think there could possibly be enough organization to keep hard evidence of vaccine microchips and "space lasers" under wraps?

Comment Re:Rest of world says... (Score 5, Interesting) 60

Wow, you've gotten this far without being aware that Microsoft requires an account for most of its services? Lucky you, I suppose.

Yes, MS accounts are a thing. They have been trying to force them down the throat of anyone setting up a Windows system since Win 10. They're also required for MS 365 and Minecraft now too.

I for one will not be checking out the spiffy new Bing chat, because not only do they require a MS account, if you want "faster access", you have to set MS Edge as your default browser, Bing as your default search engine, and MSN as your default among other things.

If I didn't know better, I'd think MS doesn't really care how well Bing chat works, as long it creates enough buzz and convinces enough users to sign up and make MS their go-to for everything. Oh, wait... I do know better.

No thanks.

Comment Go off the rails... (Score 2) 60

...or simply lose its mind. Really? They

didn't "fully envision" people using its chat interface for "social entertainment" or as a tool for more "general discovery of the world."

?? What do they think people use search engines for? Also, it seems pretty apparent that's what folks have been doing with every new "AI" tech that becomes available to play with. Clearly Bing chat is not ready for prime time just yet, but I guess that's never stopped M$ from releasing new products before, so why start now...

Comment Re:It ain't broke (Score 1) 52

I mostly agree. They can do whatever they want with the interface, as long as it's just as easy to use, runs as well as or better than it already does, doesn't require anyone to relearn anything, and for gods sakes doesn't take any inspiration whatsoever from the latest Micros**t Outlook interface!

Also, sure would be cool if they could finish up that Maildir support.

Submission + - U.S. says it 'hacked the hackers' to bring down ransomware gang (reuters.com)

unimind writes: For anyone who thinks ransomware is a bad thing, it looks like the government did something good today:

The FBI on Thursday revealed it had secretly hacked and disrupted a prolific ransomware gang called Hive, a maneuver that allowed the bureau to thwart the group from collecting more than $130 million in ransomware demands from more than 300 victims. At a news conference, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Deputy U.S. Attorney General Lisa Monaco said government hackers broke into Hive's network and put the gang under surveillance, surreptitiously stealing the digital keys the group used to unlock victim organizations' data. They were then able to alert victims in advance so they could take steps to protect their systems before Hive demanded the payments. "Using lawful means, we hacked the hackers," Monaco told reporters. "We turned the tables on Hive."


Slashdot Top Deals

The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin

Working...