Whatever he said or wrote they declared it wrong and that people don't have a right to know what he said. As for it being science, his blabbering is at least as much science as their censorship. While FaceBook may or may not be using as their dogma statements by reputable scientists who are actually engaged in scientific study of the virus, censorship is not science, it's anti-science. Science is presenting actual evidence the person you disagree with is wrong, not declaring he's wrong and people aren't to listen to him.

The problem is how COVID deaths are counted vs. how Flu deaths are counted. If you get a serious case of the flu, go into the hospital and while there get an infection of some sort which eventually kills you that's not counted as a flu death. If the same happens with COVID, that IS counted as a COVID death. Now, both methods can actually be justified, this isn't any sort of conspiracy, but the end result is that it's nearly impossible to actually compare COVID deaths to flu deaths. Then on the other hand you have the way most of the world economy has been shut down which does greatly reduce the number of deaths. Personally, I believe (with no evidence to support it) that the total number of COVID deaths given equivalent conditions is several times that of most Flu viruses, but you can't simply compare two numbers in isolation.

I haven't read what Trump posted, and don't intend to so lets grant for the sake of argument that it is as moronic as you claim. That doesn't change the fact that Facebook is censoring information to fit their views of what "the truth" is.

No, that's a whole bunch of different fabrics some of which are biodegradable https://sewport.com/fabrics-di... "synthetic fibre" doesn't automatically mean it's a pollution problem.

Plenty. 1)Select fibers that degrade relatively quickly (i.e less nylon more rayon or short lived polyester. 2)accept GMO for improved fibers rather than non-biodegradable synthetics 3)change the way we handle waste disposal so the plastics actually get recycled, or at least compacted and buried rather than allowed to spread. etc... None of these are perfect solutions, but if we actually implemented them we'd eliminate nearly all the microfibres that are a problem. If there's still a serious problem after those are implemented then you start getting into "solutions" that impact quality of life.

What I'd like to know, and doesn't seem to be mentioned, is how much of those micofibres are actually a problem. Rayon is after all a synthetic that degrades naturally just fine, and even the toughest polyester (which is actually a large group of materials some of them natural and some of the synthetic ones bio-degredable) breaks down in ~40 years, which while terrible compared to most organics, is still great compared to most plastics, and thus not as much of a problem (which granted isn't the same as not a problem). Plastic microparticles in the enviroment that you can expect to cycle through the ecosystem pretty much unchanged for the next few centuries are a serious problem, microfibers that will float around for decades might, or might not be a proble, I don't know, naturally degredable micro fibres regardless of if they're synthetic or not are not a problem and people trying to equate them to plastic micro-particles are at best idiots.

Refrigeration does not require an electric grid, or even electricity. Using an electric refrigerator does require electricity, but not an electric grid.

If you have a box of stuff that is taking up any significant "mental space" you really should get rid of it (unless it's something like your grandfather's will where he named you the executor). Cables don't take any "mental space" except when you're looking for one you need, or possibly when moving.

Nor does it mention that sometimes you find a use for the old cords/power supplies. Granted modern electronics seem to go out of their way to ensure that won't happen by each coming up with a unique one to use for their devices, but despite their best efforts I have reused old power cords, power supplies and data cables.

In both cases the statements are true and have been true all along, as long as you add the qualifier with which they were originally made "...if you agree to fund this project". Given that the politicians keep not agreeing to fund the project the date keeps getting pushed back.

I think everyone has taken algebra, what they haven't taken is mind reading classes, so we still have no idea why you think an acceleration 4 times what was calculated would be needed. From what I can tell a constant acceleration of somewhere between 6.2 and 6.3m/s^2 would be enough to get you to a point exactly opposite you on the planet within an hour traveling in an arc with a peak 100km up. While granted the effects of gravity would require you'd need to vary the ship's drive power to cancel out the effects of gravity, but as long as the average acceleration is as described it would work. now if you wanted to reach the spot in half the time, than yes, the average acceleration would need to increase by a factor of 4.

The politicians on both sides think the voters in general (even if possibly not you specifically) are that stupid, and the reason they think so is that they've been proven right repeatedly. The truth doesn't matter for most people, only the latest sound bite.

Do you have any idea what a "currency" is? The fact that X is a stock doesn't mean it can't also be a currency. No clue if Bitcoin is a currency but even if it was stock and not just "like stock in the specific case being discussed", that wouldn't have an effect on if it is or isn't currency.

Yes, and most companies don't deal with multiple currencies. If you go to the supermarket in the US or France or Germany, the reaction if you offer to pay in Yen or Bitcoin is likely to be the same - "we don't deal with that". Bit coin has it's uses, but that doesn't include normal day-to-day transactions.

The law is that practicing medicine without a license is illegal. If you are practicing medicine and don't have a license (or have the wrong sort of medical license) you're liable to go to jail regardless of if you call yourself a doctor or not. Calling yourself a doctor without a license isn't illegal, practicing medicine without a license is.