Because the subsystem handling end user input/output is not the language model? Browser queries use to have the same hallucinations and return the same nonsense responses.

I have read this post many years ago when java in the kernel was the topic. Forgive me but your angry stance seems somewhat disingenuous. My opinion.

You are trying to justify adding a language that wants to use dma for example.,.... A second language that uses another running program to demand memory from the kernel. This is just an assumption mind you, but I willing to bet you submitted something in the past that violated some basic rule of memory management that got refused? Maybe Cgroups? Just an assumption mind you.... Many contributers at one time were convinced that cgroups was unworkable without adding a whole new language to "manage memory" with untested minor release rust as their solution.

I'm sure glad you all made it clear Bill Gates was not going to win a presidential election in the US. Your first choice sure is pretty btw......./

I was hoping it was "pumpernickel pickle " I knew a guy named.....

Or wrap in in a pagefault, so you can have it in a return value. Then hide it some app helper's i/o stream. Then you can have some platform built around it.....

Does this thing remind anyone of spectre mitigation hackups at all?

Lets revive the environment that allowed patents to shield things like private sector crypto speculation.

US is told by Canada that Candian attempts are are from India. And Steve Bannon talked about this very scenario several times as an election ploy and happens to have just got out of jail? Days before an election?

So what now? Forbidding AI from knowing certain languages? No AI equivalent of a process 0/process 1?

You may consider the environment border free, I may consider the environment border free.....but the Russian government has submitted lists of contributers, hundreds of names, that should be forbidden to submit patches while warning of "dire" consequences? Zelenskyy even made the list and wasn't even in politics yet. And I wonder how many people restricted due to sanctions now were on that list?

Who does that hurt really? They made their own smartphone OS essentially because they were unhappy with the conditions the dominant OS's put on their contributions. China complains about backdoors all the time yet are constantly caught doing just that. Whatever....assuming all things equal they could of just forked linux 30 years ago or any time since then, or windows when they were given the source code after claiming a great victory with reverse engineering it. We would have a competitor to those projects by now. Everything they develop in my opinion is potentially a backdoor, even likely and barely works in western environments. My opinion is that had 100% been their intention, always was and the 5G rip out is a perfect example. 20 years ago China with Russia's backing took their 5G cause to the UN complaining about unfair dominance on the west's part. The UN then suggested making China's development the priority. Just to have all their infrastructure ripped out and replaced.

Better than patch acceptance being based upon if a maintainer likes you. Nobody talks about about that dark side of open source. Maybe less likely with say, the NSA watching and contributing?

With some minor modifications those battery farms in the matrix can also become memory banks.....

Because backdoors only make sense when a private corporation makes them! My momma TOLD me!