Trying to stop an application from creating a session to do, whatever? Whole corporations have been chartered to inform the rest of the Internet of their constitutional rights to do so.....

For the most shortsighted of reasons, sure. They need a way feed the rich who got them elected as they have no coherent ideas about economic growth or infrastructure. I'm thinking back as far as over 20 years ago when cable was marketed as being the natural successor to telco solutions when they even then were promising 1 Gig downloads and downplaying DSL. "Just run more coaxial". It would have been cheaper to deploy upgraded xDSL in "hindsight". And please note how many of this current administration were either on some board or worked in some capacity at a cable company or internet company 20 to 25 years ago.

rolls_eyes maybe_right(arg, arg);

Owning nothing is extreme I'd admit. But the current personal goals of just making sure you have more than everyone else is not working, at all. There is only so much an individual 'needs" when the needs of others are considered.

Depending on the instance any post you make gets lots of views on mastodon. Follows and likes are overrated while most have no use for followers other than to stroke their ego.

So are corporations which can get away with so much because we assume any action by a corporation is for its own "self" preservation.

Important to mention our electrical grids are straining under the demand. I am guessing a comfortable amount of homes with AC running constantly is about 20% to 30% meaning 70% to 80% are supposed to do without? That same ratio of people with cars to people without will eliminate traffic jams. My point is the world economy is designed to service about that same ratio of haves to have nots.

The questions I will ask now are; do you have AC in your home? Your car? At work?

look at sashiko.

It's very likely that any changes to a codebase will force a change elsewhere since there is now bugged code. The first change doesn't have to be the obviously bugged code. All things equal with no other context given a revert will kill the bug.

No

Just like firewall rules. If the application of the firewalled system is not logical then firewall filters will mostly hinder you without constant changes.....

There laws to guide every keystroke a person executes on a computer. There are some laws and almost unlimited standards to describe every persistent result of input. There are well defined laws, standards, licenses to define how/where/why those persistent archives are to be used. So, there is very little question about how artificial intelligence "should" be used. Just like we know how a human being "should" be treated, but we keep resolving to slavery, rape, drowning refugees, wars because some people have decided actual morals are only for the poor.

Remember when the dark web was all the domains they couldn't figure out how to deny at the query level? It took 20 years to make a browser that displays just what the corporation wants so I guess they have to start over.....

If someone in an entry level position had suggested a sad harmonica and slidewistle admonishment instead of a pie in the face they'd be a manager by now. No, no they would have likely been fired.