look at sashiko.

It's very likely that any changes to a codebase will force a change elsewhere since there is now bugged code. The first change doesn't have to be the obviously bugged code. All things equal with no other context given a revert will kill the bug.

No

Just like firewall rules. If the application of the firewalled system is not logical then firewall filters will mostly hinder you without constant changes.....

There laws to guide every keystroke a person executes on a computer. There are some laws and almost unlimited standards to describe every persistent result of input. There are well defined laws, standards, licenses to define how/where/why those persistent archives are to be used. So, there is very little question about how artificial intelligence "should" be used. Just like we know how a human being "should" be treated, but we keep resolving to slavery, rape, drowning refugees, wars because some people have decided actual morals are only for the poor.

Remember when the dark web was all the domains they couldn't figure out how to deny at the query level? It took 20 years to make a browser that displays just what the corporation wants so I guess they have to start over.....

If someone in an entry level position had suggested a sad harmonica and slidewistle admonishment instead of a pie in the face they'd be a manager by now. No, no they would have likely been fired.

I can't help but feel like "influencers" main job is to be distracting enough to get the attention of unfocused and easily influenced people. The actual content often has no journalistic integrity. A lot like TV news I guess.

Any KVM fundamental changes can affect the kernel by changing resource allocation especially for user space. Applications are in some ways considered hyper featured virtual machines, at least some developers think so. There are even a few key kernel features that began as vm exclusive functionality actually lobbied in to app support.

This study suggests that the relatively less populated and spread out populations have the highest occurrences.
https://www.nature.com/article...

A technical issue. There are legal opinions on data rights casualties going back to the beginning of the public telephone networks. You backtrack through all that and the core of it is; whoever archives and serves the data owns it. I know, "it's your data..." and there are laws to prove it. Bullshit, they don't care and you cant monetize "your data" to support GDP. I'm convinced that the only acceptable solution was from the beginning, for individuals to seriously maintain private databases and data links to personal devices. Securing one's person and all that..... We were just too stupid and lazy to acknowledge the obvious threat as a threat. After all it's not like some people didn't see this coming, most didn't care.

I really do not think you believe any of what you posted.

Is the tool the problem or its it the way our civilization forces artistic expression underground in favor of the easy to clone and mass produce? LLM's are not causing anyone create the next linux or windows while the next easiest way to exploit the likes is always a year away.

I am guessing that broadcast copyright standards make that impractical and making other content part of the stream also makes someone responsible for such content who does not want to be. Then again broadcast networks would produce much of the adverts they showed and they had contracts with each other to show such content. I imagine a similar environment would complicate the idea of personal video posts quite a bit.

You must have not known about the SCSI/T1 driver on those TRS tandys.... !