Does anyone know if there are any potential unintended consequences for this? Suppose we start sucking power from the earth at a pace in the TW or PW range? Would this affect the earth in 5, 10, or 100 years? When humans started burning coal and oil over a century ago, I doubt anyone anticipated global warming.
I never formally studied physics beyond the introductory level, so forgive my ignorance. How does thermodynamics play into this? Once a few PJ of energy are sucked out of the earth, how is it replenished?
This isn't always the case with mergers, but it isn't entirely a bad thing. Hear me out. There is still Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, Boeing, and many other big companies in the business, so there is still some competition.
I have worked at a facility with government contracts before. The facility I was at had contractors from several companies, often performing very similar roles. It sounds strange, but this sort of thing could actually save the tax payer some money. Instead of having 2 24x7 support contracts with 12 people each from 2 different companies, if they were to merge, the total people could be reduced from 24 to 18.
There were actually quite a few contractors and products from smaller companies where I was at.
Another possible upside is better quality in some cases. Since multiple companies had stuff on the same network performing similar functions, data storage for different applications for example, the storage systems could be consolidated resulting in better performance and lower costs.
The way some contracts work is performance based. Take cruise missiles for example (no, I didn't work with cruise missiles). It would be expected that if an agreed upon number of cruise missiles don't work as advertised, say it misses its target or its warhead fails to detonate, the amount the government pays for the contract drops significantly.
As someone else mentioned, one time pads could be used in certain applications, but the following things (and certainly more) could no longer be trusted:
I think salesforce is shooting themselves in the foot. Pun Intended. I would be very hesitant to do business with a company trying to do this.
Why would I do business with a company that would be willing to arbitrarily decide I need to change my product or service or they will stop doing business with me? If they make it clear ahead of time, that is one thing. After the fact like this, I would lose trust and confidence in them.
This is why I use FLOSS as much as possible.
I doubt I am unique in thinking this way.
I wonder if there is less demand because the market is flooded with them? As someone else mentioned, it use to be a ticket to print your own paycheck. My guess is that people figured this out and rushed into the programs. The market flooded and drove down demand. When everyone has an MBA, you need something else to set you apart.
I have known people that have gotten various degrees for the piece of paper. They want the paper so they can get a job that pays more. I question how much they learned. A good interviewer can see through this.
With the exception of myopic and crooked organizations, your ability to get the job done is what really matters. I think people are realizing this. When I look at job listings, I often see requirements of X degree or X years experience demonstrating the equivalent skill.
Things are not as simple as they seems at first. - Edward Thorp