Comment Mission accompilished (Score 1) 108
If the idea was to get others to finance the site rather than tax payer's money: Mission accomplished.
Now that money can go where it belongs: Into the coffers of Trump and his family.
If the idea was to get others to finance the site rather than tax payer's money: Mission accomplished.
Now that money can go where it belongs: Into the coffers of Trump and his family.
As usual the old people are wrong because if it's one thing old people are good at it's being wrong.
Good thing that young people are never wrong. They are known for that on worldwide.
And why? Tell the author, he might learn something new.
Of course chipping your pet would be much easier and probably also much more reliable.
WTF?
I hereby declare myself not eligible to see ads.
Some kind of token format could be used for AI which would be converted to human readable text when necessary.
At the current state of AI I am pretty sure that it would be a bad idea to do away with human readable code. AI just not as reliable as we'd need for that. But I won't rule out that AI could become good enough for that.
I definitely hope so, because smaller companies will only be able to buy it if it is available to consumers. And the small company I work for definitely needs drives as large as possible to be put into a RAID for our massive video and picture servers.
This!
... that electricity guzzling AI would actually reduce waste? At least some. Kind of.
OK, so which "European supplier" are you talking about ?
I know of only one European AI company: Mistral.
(And then there is DeepL, but they specialize on translation.)
Are there any others?
Loved it! Thanks.
The media keeps calling that vending machine stupid, but in reality is is an experiment and not expected to work perfectly. Anthropic keeps updating and refining it, and they learned a lot in the process.
Anybody remeber this?
DOGE To Rewrite SSA Codebase In 'Months'
[posted on slashdot 2025-03-29]
https://developers.slashdot.or...
They must have finished it by now. So how did it go? Thought so.
200 is quite a bit of damage.
So maybe a single donor's sperm should also only be used a few times?
(I admit I have no idea how difficult it is to get donors, so maybe there are so few that their sperm must be used a lot.)
Also: 200 is the number of babies that were born from it. Given that artificial insemination isn't 100% successful, his sperm was probably used much more often than that.
Let's hope his sperm has now been removed from the pool.
Higher turnover can also simply mean higher inflation.
(But I forgot: The greatest president^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hdictator of all times said that there is no inflation.)
Let's organize this thing and take all the fun out of it.