We need to stop letting everybody start legal proceedings in Texas just because it's a favorable venue. Way too many of these stories by patent trolls seem to be out of that jurisdiction.
are you advocating...messing with Texas?!
(whose experience can't be replicated virtually - you miss out of the feel from real balls hitting real objects)
In other news...the porn industry is still doing quite well. Even sans this feature...
The ones without any sense here are the people who can't even imagine the huge number of ways you can use a tablet to improve your life.
Yep - that's me! I've thought about it - a tablet can improve my life in exactly 0 ways.
I have a netbook. It cost ~$200 5 years ago. In practical size/weight, its just as big as your iPad (I have fit it in a cargo pants pocket in a pinch). Yes the iPad is thinner and lighter, but really...it doesn't much matter because you fit the iPad in the same kinds of things you fit a netbook into.
Oh yeah...netbooks have these crazy looking things called keyboards. They're amazing! My netbook isn't the fastest thing on the planet...actually its much closer to the slowest (yes - I have the Asus eee 4G Surf). But you know what? It really doesn't matter in any practical sense. I can still watch youtube vids, work on spreadsheets, check e-mail, play games, get on teh facebookz, and program arduinos using it. Battery life is about 4 hours. All the components are solid state (except the cooling fan), so its as robust as a brick, even though it looks pretty cheapy and plasticy.
IMO, the ones without any sense here are the ones who equate a shiny/weighty package with "high build quality" or the ones who don't realize that for much less money you could buy a netbook that can either keep pace or run circles around your iCrap in any practical measure.
High Speed Rail would have the EXACT same security measures as airplanes
Some of these things exist in the US already (Accela run by Amtrak between DC and New York City), and they don't have anywhere near the security measures airports do. No body scans...no metal detectors...just walk on and hand someone a ticket. If lines between these urban centers don't have security even though it could be easily implemented, why would new lines all of a sudden have DHS security around them?
Where would it be efficient? Very few cities have the public transportation infrastructure to support such a train station. Remember, you're competing with driving and airplanes.
You're making a big assumption here without even realizing it. I don't think rail would be a competitor to either of those techs - it would be a new option altogether. I live in San Francisco. Right now, if I want to go to Seattle I could:
a) Drive for 12 hours (long and annoying!)
b) Take a 1.5 hour plane flight...where I need to be at the airport 2 hours early, and get dropped off about an hour or so from Seattle city center in traffic, thus making the whole trip take about ~5 hours...without delays due to weather or pilots being late. Oh yeah, and don't forget about the baggage limits, security, incredibly uncomfortable cabin, and people with no social skills involved with that option.
Wouldn't it be awesome if there were a
c) Take a train that takes maybe 8-10 hours, costs as much as the airplane ride, but is comfy and relaxing?
There would still be several times where a) and b) may make more sense, but I would probably opt for c) a good portion of the time.
Although I agree with everything you are saying in theory, I think there are some practical matters here that make these things tricky:
1. Company computers should only be allowed to perform company functions, and only company computers should be allowed to access company assets.
So, what is a company function? I agree - changing/revealing SSNs is a company function. However, a ton of viruses come from contaminated USB sticks too. If your job is to review a bunch of vendor presentations from USB sticks/e-mail/other external sources, how do you secure your "company" computer?
2. Computer users should never have more access to their own computer or to company assets than they need. And always be conservative at first, and bump up their privs later if it becomes necessary.
Sounds great. However, it always takes IT at least an hour to do this at my company, so its a royal pain in the ass. If someone could make an automated IT system that gives rights only when needed (yes - just like sudo), I'd be all over implementing something like this because it wouldn't didn't completely screw up work days time after time after time.
3. In situations where users might have access to assets that could potentially put other people's information at risk, those users should be required to undergo some basic security training.
Yep. This happens already. I think you are forgetting that most people are retards when it comes to this kind of stuff though. Oopsie-daises still happen. Maybe at a lower rate than before, but they still happen. And before you say that the solution is just not to hire that person for the job, realize that a lot of times they are the old farts sitting at the top of organizations that are making the mistakes...i.e. you can't fire them (even if you'd like to).
I really think people just need to realize that f-ups are going to happen every now and again. Maybe the easier solution is no SSNs required for bank accounts! No me telling telephone operators secret codes in plain, spoken, English over the phone! That way, all this data could be encrypted in a way that no human would be able to read or retrieve it.
It appears that PL/I (and its dialects) is, or will be, the most widely used higher level language for systems programming. -- J. Sammet