Re:You know... (Score 1)

"You are simply asserting that a non-observed non-contingent entity (a god) caused to come into being a contingent observed entity (the universe) is more plausible than the observed entity being non-contingent. I see no justification for that assertion and disagree with it." The issue is with the observed entity being non-contingent. The universe we know of is 15 billion years old. Whatever has a beginning does not exist necessarily, for whatever exists necessarily cannot not exist, but clearly at some point, the universe did not exist. "I know I'm responding to a logical fallacy, but I'm sure others have done it too" Would you care to point out the fallacy?