That's a brilliant idea. It's the institutions that mandate "publish or perish", and yet the responsibility for reviews, and any fallout from fabrication is entirely on the publishers. Institutions therefore have little concern for how their employers scam the system by publishing garbage. By scoring the institutions that employ the authors based on the integrity, as well as the quantity of their scholarly output, responsibility for quality becomes shared by all involved. It becomes an ecosystem in which every member shares the burden of quality control. These dual integrity and quantity scores would also provide a valuable metric for ranking institutions.

Also related: "Linus Torvalds schools Lennart Poettering on the importance of users" https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I'd agree in instilling values - but I wouldn't suggest doing it in a dogmatic, preaching kind of way. Rather, tell her about yourself, and use the stories of your life to illustrate how you developed and applied your values. You will capture much more nuance by doing it that way, and at the same time you give her a chance to actually get to know who you are at the same time.

Ceebot: http://www.ceebot.com/ A well thought-out, gradual curriculum, broken into a series of lessons structured as rewarding game levels. Best thing - they can get through it without constant hand holding.