Comment Re:How about this one (Score 1) 1251
Let's just take an obvious case (and one that most people agree with) : Don't Kill
- what is the definition of life, and what constitutes killing?
- is it OK to kill one person to save the life of another?
- the Romans seemed to think that killing non-Romans was not that big of a deal, but killing a Roman Citizen WAS a big deal
- in semi-recent times, Hitler seemed to think it was not a bad idea to kill a significant portion of the German (and conquered territories) population
- Stalin, Pol Pot, and others held similar views (ie: ethnic cleansing?)
- some religions believe that "Convert or Die" is OK (ie: it's OK to kill to further a particular system, or for the greater good)
- there was the concept of an eye-for-an-eye - ie: if somebody kills your brother, should you be able to kill that person?
- is it OK for governments to have capital punishment? (ie:certain crimes have the death penalty)?
- is WAR OK? (that seems to be mass killing)
- what about the wanted dead or alive posters/statements? - this seems to imply that its OK to kill some persons?
- didn't the president sign the NDAA (and nobody complained)? - which implies that our society believes that it's OK for SOME people to kill others but not the other way around?
- that's not to mention suicide - ie: what about killing yourself?
- what timeframe are we looking at - ie: is smoking, and eating high fat, high salt, high cholesterol foods a way of slowly killing yourself?
- what about high risk activities - are you really just trying to kill yourself?
- what about Kevorkian and his assisted suicides?
- what about mercy killing?
- if mercy killing is OK, is it OK to kill somebody to prevent them from sinning and going to hell?
(I could probably go on for a lot longer, but I think you get the point)