Comment Mac perspective of computing (Score 1) 269
I think it's obvious that a journalist who covers the Macintosh would feel the definition of an OS includes the applications he mentions. Since the demise of the Apple II, Apple has included applications such as a GUI interface, control panel, etc, in all their models. Innovative computers such as the Lisa and Macintosh should be applauded for breakthoughs they made in the desktop 'user experience'. It is quite possible the author has used a computer without a shell since 1984. We should thank Apple for this option, because it has created benefits for all of us in many ways.
Categorizing UNIX as a non-OS is false. However, I still find his argument fascinating, not on it's merits, but in the fact that it indicates that many users don't really understand the fundamental software components of their computer. I am not upset by this as much as impressed at the rapid advances that have been made which allow my Mom to check her e-mail.
Categorizing UNIX as a non-OS is false. However, I still find his argument fascinating, not on it's merits, but in the fact that it indicates that many users don't really understand the fundamental software components of their computer. I am not upset by this as much as impressed at the rapid advances that have been made which allow my Mom to check her e-mail.
