Heh...there's a thin line between legitimate attempts to make use of the courts and abuse of the process. But again, in my opinion, the solution is for a "wrongly accused" party to file a counterclaim against them based on the supposed abuse, rather than to just make blanket suppositions that the riaa shouldn't be allowed to make use of the system b/c they've purportedly accused some people incorrectly. I notice that most people that have been sued don't bother with the "it wasn't me" claims, likely b/c the overwhelming majority know what they were doing. Most of the ones who argue that they aren't liable throw out ridiculous (read: generally legally irrelevant) arguments like, "it must have been my children, but i didnt know what they were up to"...

I saw the article you referred to...good read.