The issue is that tools give people the impression that they can escape responsibility and therefore accountability. And if the law confirms that, we're all fucked. So there needs to be a severe sanction against someone, and I mean a real person, not a fine to a company. Otherwise we create dystopia one step at a time.
I don't deny anything, I'm not sure where you got that idea. I also don't know why you feel the need to be aggressive but it's off-putting.
I asked for specific examples of your claim. I haven't used windows in ages so I have no idea, genuinely. No need to write a long ranty answer with zero example. I'm also interested in where you get this value of 20%, I have only encountered rare cases of games that do not work with proton and I think they have been fixed since then; but this might say more about my taste in games than anything else.
Which loss of functionality are you referring to?
There are plenty of women who are not like that, in fact they are the vast majority I believe, I hope you end up finding them. You may have to look in different places or with a different mindset. A first step would be to not waste your time with anyone who feels entitled to you buying them food or drinks. Start on a basis of equality and independence, and you won't have to deal with entitlement. Of course the people you meet this way will have no patience for any form of entitlement coming from you either, fair is fair.
It seems like you are conflating "AI" with "LLMs". I think it's a mistake. There are better AI tools than LLMs for pricing.
I can also see this becoming a zero-sum war among LLMs. Zero-sum, that is, only if you ignore the societal and environmental cost of data centres churning bits.
Call me old fashioned if you must; I still say that spending all that new compute just to end up with pretty much the old pricing is a tad irresponsible, anti-social, and self-defeating. In other words, it's very corporate and very Capitalistic.
Does TFA say that this is LLM-powered? I didn't find such a statement, maybe I glanced too fast. I would find it surprising that they use an LLM for that. Pricing is generally an optimisation problem, LLMs are not very good at optimisation. "How much is a person willing to pay" is a prediction problem and there's also algorithms better and cheaper than LLMs for that.
As a fourth option, it could just be the AI mistake it's being portrayed as.
The keyword is "overreliance". That automatically makes it a human mistake, not an AI mistake, because the humans choose how much they rely on the tool.
The Rust version is licensed under the MIT license, in case anyone was wondering. The Ubuntu Discourse post says the change is not about licensing, but about security. What it does not provide is any kind of statistic on security issues related to coreutils.
I find it hypocritical. Progressives in this state hate monopolies, unless its a labor monopoly which shovels huge amounts of cash to the Democrats.
It's weird mental gymnastics to call a union a "labor monopoly" to support drawing a false equivalence. Monopolies are generally disliked, not just by D people, because they prevent free competition, which is a staple of US economic and social policy. It's about protecting consumers and entrepreneurs. A union is about protecting workers. Both anti-monopoly laws and labour unions are about protecting people from nefarious effects of a completely unregulated market. The fact that the same people who want to have a monopoly also hate unions should tell you something.
The irony is the at if Apple and Google do leave the uk and eu market, meaning no more iOS or Android
This will not happen. Apple and Android do not want to abandon whole markets to competitors, they want to dominate these markets. This is a weird fantasy that keeps popping up, usually from people who are proud of being from the US and champion a weird understanding of freedom of expression and freedom of choice. Apple and Android are not interested in freedom; they want your money, brain bandwidth, and everybody else's. Give it to them in a totalitarian society and they will happily take it.
Countries, including America
America is not a country.
Let's put the motivation aside for a minute. Have you asked yourself "at what cost"?
I don't know about you, personally I have never voted for someone I fully agreed with on every issue. Voting is more of a "lesser of two evils" situation. Are you really fine with the whole descent into fascism, rampant corruption, degradation of public health, nepotism, degradations of cost of living, etc? Is it all a fair price to pay for whatever you perceive the benefit to be?
Competing for what's a harder issue to deal with is fucking stupid when all need help. The people in your family clearly have a very hard life. But I don't understand why you leap from that to somewhat attaching trans folks. If it were so easy to be trans, they wouldn't have record suicide rates and a whole assortment of mental health issues. There is no need to belittle other people's needs, and there is no merit to it either.
We're less than a year into Iran, calling it 'endless' is really premature
Is it premature to call it unnecessary and with no clear stated goal or benefit for the US?
Is it premature to remind you that Trump campaigned on "no more wars"?
In case that helps: I'm not part of the "same people" you mention, I have not done what you describe.
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law. -- Roy Santoro
