What does Sony lose by using stock Busybox and putting the tarball on FTP?
This deserves an answer. Consider the cost of compliance - making sure that FTP stays up and doesn't bit-rot the files, keeping account of the version of busybox used in each released product and its various versions (hardware revisions and software). Making sure that customer support world-wide knows how to answer questions related to GPL and point them to the FTP area. Busybox compliance checking always starts with a simple email to your customer support, and if your out-sourced customer support gets the answer wrong, the next step is a laywer-written letter to corporate HQ, then people inside the company start clucking like a chicken about how much this GPL stuff is costing them in discussion meetings and memos about how to remedy the compliance problem. Repeat that a few times and its obvious the solution is to prefer non-GPL libraries.
In computing, the mean time to failure keeps getting shorter.